 |
State |
Status/Date |
Level |
Summary |
|
 | Accountability |
| |
| Accountability--Accreditation |
| |
| Accountability--Measures/Indicators |
| |
| Accountability--Reporting Results |
| |
| Accountability--Rewards |
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions |
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions--No Pass No Drive |
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions--Takeovers |
| |
| Accountability--School Improvement |
| |
| Adult Basic Education |
| |
| Assessment |
| |
| Assessment--Accommodations |
| |
| Assessment--End-of-Course |
| |
| Assessment--Formative/Interim |
| |
| Assessment--High Stakes/Competency |
| |
| Assessment--NAEP (NAEP Results and NAEP Organization) |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention) |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention)--Alternative Education |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention)--Drugs/Alcohol |
| |
| Attendance |
| |
| Attendance--Compulsory |
| |
| Attendance--Statutory Ages (Upper and Lower) |
| |
| Attendance--Truancy |
| |
| Background Checks |
| |
| Bilingual/ESL |
| |
| Business Involvement |
| |
| Career/Technical Education |
| |
| Career/Technical Education--Career Academies/Apprenticeship |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Closings |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Cyber Charters |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Finance |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Research |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Choice/Open Enrollment |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Magnet or Specialized Schools |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Vouchers |
| |
| Civic Education |
| |
| Civic Education--Character Education |
| |
| Civic Education--Pledge of Allegiance |
| |
| Class Size |
| |
| Curriculum |
| |
| Curriculum--Alignment |
| |
| Curriculum--Arts Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Drivers Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Environmental Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Financial Literacy/Economics Ed. |
| |
| Curriculum--Foreign Language/Sign Language |
| |
| Curriculum--Health/Nutrition Education |
| |
| Curriculum--International Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Language Arts--Writing/Spelling |
| |
| Curriculum--Mathematics |
| |
| Curriculum--Multicultural |
| |
| Curriculum--Physical Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Science |
| |
| Curriculum--Sex Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Social Studies/History |
| |
| Demographics |
| |
| Demographics--Enrollments |
| |
| Desegregation |
| |
| Economic/Workforce Development |
| |
| Equity |
| |
| Federal |
| |
| Finance |
| |
| Finance--Adequacy/Core Cost |
| |
| Finance--Bonds |
| |
| Finance--District |
| |
| Finance--Equity |
| |
| Finance--Facilities |
| |
| Finance--Federal |
| |
| Finance--Funding Formulas |
| |
| Finance--Litigation |
| |
| Finance--Local Foundations/Funds |
| |
| Finance--Lotteries |
| |
| Finance--Performance Funding |
| |
| Finance--Private Giving |
| |
| Finance--Resource Efficiency |
| |
| Finance--State Budgets/Expenditures |
| |
| Finance--Student Fees |
| |
| Finance--Taxes/Revenues |
| |
| Finance--Taxes/Revenues--Alternative Revenues |
| |
| Governance |
| |
| Governance--Deregulation/Waivers/Home Rule |
| |
| Governance--Ethics/Conflict of Interest |
| |
| Governance--School Boards |
| |
| Governance--School Boards--Training |
| |
| Governance--Site-Based Management |
| |
| Governance--State Boards/Chiefs/Agencies |
| |
| Health |
| |
| Health--Child Abuse |
| |
| Health--School Based Clinics or School Nurses |
| |
| Health--Suicide Prevention |
| |
| Health--Teen Pregnancy |
| |
| High School |
| |
| High School--Advanced Placement |
| |
| High School--College Readiness |
| |
| High School--Dual/Concurrent Enrollment |
| |
| High School--Exit Exams |
| |
| High School--GED (General Education Development) |
| |
| High School--Graduation Requirements |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Grading Practices |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Homeschooling |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Homework/Study Skills |
| |
| Integrated Services/Full-Service Schools |
| |
| Leadership |
| |
| Leadership--District Superintendent |
| |
| Leadership--District Superintendent--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Certification and Licensure |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Evaluation and Effectiveness |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Preparation |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Recruitment and Retention |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Tenure |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues--African American |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues--American Indian / Alaska Native / Native Hawaiian |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues--Hispanic |
| |
| No Child Left Behind |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Adequate Yearly Progress |
| |
 | No Child Left Behind--Assessment |
| |
| OK | Emergency Rule Adoption 11/2003 | P-12 | Establishes emergency rules regarding school administration and instructional services. Concerns School Testing Program scope and general administration. OKLAHOMA REG 12999 (SN)
Title: OAC 210:10-13-2 thru -18 (non seq.)
Source: StateNet
| |
| CA | Signed into law 10/2003 | P-12 | Amends the existing Leroy F. Greene California Assessment of Academic Achievement Act that provides a system of individual assessment of pupils. The existing act establishes the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program and requires each school district, charter
school, and county office of education to administer to each of its pupils in grades 2 to 11, inclusive, an achievement test and a
standards-based achievement test. Requires, commencing on July 1, 2004, the achievement test to be administered to pupils in grades 3 and 8, and the standards-aligned achievement test to be administered to pupils in grades 2 to 11. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1451-1500/ab_1485_bill_20031011_chaptered.html
Title: A.B. 1485 §§ 4 - 7
Source: California Legislative Web site
| |
| MS | Rule Adoption 09/2003 | P-12 | Establishes rules pertaining to procedures for assigning student assessment results for calculating achievement, growth, AYP. MISSISSIPPI REG 8848 (SN)
Title: (Uncodified)
Source: StateNet
| |
| IL | Signed into law 08/2003 | P-12 | Makes changes concerning school recognition standards for student performance and school improvement, recognition levels, rewards and acknowledgements for schools and school districts, academic warning and watch statuses for schools and districts, school and district improvement panels, state interventions, mandate waivers, technical assistance from the state board of education, and an appeals process. http://www.legis.state.il.us/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=878&GAID=3&DocTypeID=SB&LegID=3731&SessionID=3
Title: S.B. 878
Source: Legislative Web site
| |
| IL | Signed into law 08/2003 | P-12 | Makes provisions regarding state goals and assessments. Provides for student testing and limits maximum time allowed for all state testing in grades 3 through 8 not to exceed 38 (instead of 40) hours across those grades.Makes changes regarding testing time and transitional bilingual educational programs. Provides that additional tests and assessment resources may be used by school districts for local diagnostic purposes. Includes students enrolled in a public university laboratory school, Department of Corrections, residential school, or academy. http://www.legis.state.il.us/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=2352&GAID=3&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=3626&SessionID=3
Title: H.B. 2352
Source: Illinois Legislative Web site
| |
| OH | Signed into law 08/2003 | P-12 | Requires the state board to develop tests to revise the system of statewide achievement testing to include annual achievement tests in reading and math in grades three through eight. Requires the state board to designate five ranges of scores on the tests (advanced, accelerated, proficient, basic and limited). States that any committee established by the department for making recommendations regarding the state board's designation of scores on the tests must inform the board of the probable percentage of students who would score in each of the ranges. To the extent possible, these percentages must be disaggregated by the subgroups designated under No Child Left Behind. Also deletes language that allowed English language learners to be temporarily exempted from testing and coforms the definition of ELL to federal law. Section 0714 concerns the administration of diagnostic assessments. Requires districts to annually assess the progress of LEP students in learning English. http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=125_HB_3
Title: H.B. 3--Section 3301.0710
Source: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us
| |
| OH | Signed into law 08/2003 | P-12 | This section defines "performance index score;" defines subgroups as major racial and ethic groups, students with disabilities, economically disadvantaged, and limited English proficient students. Defines "other academic indicators" as attendance rate for elementary and middle schools and the graduation rate for high schools. Defines "Annual measurable objective"and requires 95% of the student population and each subgroup to be tested, except for any subgroup that contains less than 40 students. In calculating AYP, subgroups of 30 or more are counted, except students with disabilities is not used in the calculation unless it contains 45 or more students.
Title: H.B. 3--3302.01
Source: www.legislature.state.oh.us
| |
| CA | Signed into law 07/2003 | P-12 | Encourages the governing board of a school district to discuss Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) test scores and to analyze the results of those assessments. Authorizes the governing board of a school district with a school not meeting a certain specified standard to conduct an assessment and adopt an improved performance plan.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_36_bill_20030714_chaptered.html
Title: A.B. 36
Source: California Legislative Web site
| |
| NY | Adopted 07/2003 | P-12 | Amends rules ensuring state and local educational agency compliance with the No Child Left Behind Act. NEW YORK REG 15972 (SN) http://www.regents.nysed.gov/July2003/0703brca2.htm From summary presented to board: Establishes accountability performance criteria and procedures for determining whether a public school, charter school or school district shall be deemed to have made "adequate yearly progress" under the NCLB. A school/district that fails to make adequate yearly progress will be designated as a "School/district Requiring Academic Progress" and will be required to undertake remedial measures while so designated, including school improvement plans, corrective action plans, restructuring plans, revised restructuring plans and other measures as required by the NCLB. Schools/districts that make adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years on all criteria and indicators for which they have been identified will be removed from such designation. A school/district that received funds under Title I for two consecutive years during which it failed to make adequate yearly progress shall be identified for school improvement under NCLB. A school/district that makes adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years shall no longer be subject to the requirements of the NCLB.
Commencing with the 2003-2004 school year, the Commissioner may identify schools/districts that meet certain specified criteria as "high performing." Commencing with the 2004-2005 school year, the Commissioner may identify other schools/districts as "rapidly improving."
For each school year during which a school remains under registration review, the board of education shall provide direct notification to parents, including a summary of the actions taken to improve performance and an explanation of available placement or program options, and the timeliness and process for parents exercising their rights to school choice.
Title: NYCRR 8 100.2 (bb)
Source: http://www.regents.nysed.gov
| |
| NY | Adopted 07/2003 | P-12 | 1) Establishes criteria for the identification and assessment of students with limited English proficiency through use of, respectively, the Language Assessment Battery-Revised (LAB-R) test and the New York State English as a Second Language Test (NYSESLAT); (2) establishes curriculum and reporting requirements for such students; and (3) updates provisions in the regulations concerning such students. With the adoption of the LAB-R and the NYSESLAT, local educational agencies will be required to assess a student's English language proficiency level for purposes of initial identification and continued eligibility for services. The results of these tests will be reported in terms of designated levels of proficiency, not percentile scores. The first administration of the NYSESLAT was in May 2003 and the results of this test will be the only data the schools will have available to make decisions as to which students are limited English proficient and entitled to services during the upcoming school year. http://www.regents.nysed.gov/July2003/0703brca1.htm
Title: NYCRR 8 Part 154
Source: http://www.regents.nysed.gov
| |
| TX | Emergency Rule Adoption 07/2003 | P-12 | Establishes rules to implement the Success Initiative. Provides purpose, authority, and definitions. Specifies exemptions and exceptions. Concerns assessment instruments, minimum passing standards, advisement and plan for academic success, and determination of readiness to perform freshman-level academic coursework. TEXAS REG 86368 (SN)
Title: 19 TAC 4.51 thru .60
Source: StateNet
| |
| AR | Rule Adoption 06/2003 | P-12 | Requires the development of a single Arkansas comprehensive testing, assessment and accountability program (ACTAAP); ensures all public school students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate grade-level academic proficiency; improves student learning and classroom instruction, and supports high academic standards for all students; requires intervention for students not performing at grade-level; establishes a program for schools districts in academic distress. http://arkedu.state.ar.us/pdf/ade%20188%20actaap.pdf
Title: ADE 188
Source: Arkansas State Web site
| |
| CT | Signed into law 06/2003 | P-12 | Revises statutes to allow student scores on grade 10 mastery exams to be added to the student's permanent record and transcipt for a student who meets or exceeds the state-wide mastery goal level for any component of the exam; students passing componets of the mastery exam should be issued a certificate of mastery for each component.
http://prdbasis.cga.state.ct.us/2003/act/Pa/2003PA-00174-R00SB-01093-PA.htm
Title: S.B. 1093 § 1
Source: Connecticut Legislative Web site
| |
| CT | Signed into law 06/2003 | P-12 | Requires testing in compliance with the No Child Left Behind Act; states an elementary teaching endorsement is valid for kindergarten to grade 6 and a comprehensive special education teaching endorsement is valid for kindergarten to grade 12; requires the state board of education to establish requirements for subject area endorsements; requires teacher certification to include teaching experience in birth-to three programs approved by the Department of Mental Retardation. http://www.cga.state.ct.us/2003/act/Pa/2003PA-00168-R00SB-01155-PA.htm
Title: S.B. 1155
Source: Connecticut Legislative Web site
| |
| DE | Rule Adoption 06/2003 | P-12 | Amended regulation to conform to state and federal statutes that address school, district and state accountability for student performance; added five levels of performance for students in grades 2, 4, 6, 7 and 9 in reading, writing and mathematics beginning in 2006; defined Adequate Yearly Process (AYP) as it affects student achievement and discusses how AYP is determined and calculated; addressed other academic indicators, assessment criteria and the school and district review process. http://www.state.de.us/research/AdminCode/Education/Education%20Administrative%20Code%20-%20100%20Accountability.htm#P4_57
Title: 14 DAC 101, 103
Source: Delware State Web site
| |
| NV | Signed into law 06/2003 | P-12 | The measure revises the public school accountability provisions of the Nevada Education Reform Act and related sections of the law to conform to requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The bill requires the state board to define the measurement for determining whether this state, each school district, and each public school has made adequate yearly progress (AYP) in accordance with the federal law. The primary method of measuring AYP will be standards-based test scores in grades 3 through 8, along with the high school proficiency examination. Secondary indicators will include graduation rates for high schools and attendance rates for all other schools. In addition, the state board is required to prepare an annual report of accountability. Further, the measure requires the state board, each school district, and each public school to develop a plan to improve the achievement of pupils. The bill also revises existing provisions concerning the accountability designations of public schools, and for the first time, requires the Department of Education to designate school districts based upon the achievement of pupils enrolled within the school district as a whole, using categories and criteria similar to the school-level accountability categories. As required under federal law, all students must now be tested, including disabled students and English Language Learners. (114 page bill) http://www.leg.state.nv.us/19thSpecial/bills/SB/SB1_EN.pdf
Title: S.B. 1 (Omnibus Bill)
Source: Research Division, Legislative Counsel Bureau
| |
| NV | Signed into law 06/2003 | P-12 | Senate Bill 1 also revises provisions governing accountability and reporting requirements, in accordance with implementing spring testing for all statewide achievement tests in grades 3 through 8. Until the 2005-2006 school year, the state will use the combination of standards-based criterion referenced tests (CRTs) and norm referenced tests (NRTs) that are currently in place. Beginning in the 2005-2006 school year, grades 3 through 8 will utilize CRTs, and the NRTs will be permanently shifted to spring administrations in grades 4, 7, and 10. Reporting dates and related accountability deadlines also are changed to accommodate spring administrations. Additional accountability reporting elements for all schools and districts will include the percentage of paraprofessionals who are not qualified as defined within the federal law. (114 page bill) http://www.leg.state.nv.us/19thSpecial/bills/SB/SB1_EN.pdf
Title: S.B. 1 (Omnibus Bill)
Source: Research Division, Legislative Counsel Bureau Summary
| |
| OK | Vetoed 06/2003 | P-12 | The performance standard and cut points are to be determined by a standard of what the average student in the applicable grade level should know relative to the content of the state academic standards set in the Priority Academic Student Skills. The performance standard and cut points are to remain consistent from year to year within the context of the Priority Academic Student Skills. Student performance levels shall be labeled: advanced, satisfactory, limited knowledge, and unsatisfactory. In addition to the information provided on test results, test scores shall be reported for each student on each test as number correct and as number incorrect. http://www2.lsb.state.ok.us/2003-04HB/hb1476_enr.rtf
Title: H.B. 1476
Source: http://www2.lsb.state.ok.us
| |
| TX | to governor 06/2003 | P-12
Postsec. | Requires state commissioner to develop, in coordination with appropriate representatives of institutions of higher education and school districts: (1) a diagnostic and assistance program for each subject assessed by an assessment instrument; and (2) other academic programs of mutual benefit to school districts and institutions of higher education. Requires the commissioner to seek private funding to make available and maintain on the Internet each diagnostic and assistance program. http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/78R/billtext/SB01108F.HTM
Title: S.B. 1108 (Section 29.910)
Source: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us
| |
| VT | Signed into law 06/2003 | P-12 | This act clarifies that the state board of education is authorized to administer federal education funds available under the No Child Left Behind Act; for the next two years, authorizes the commissioner of education to make an annual, instead of biennial, determination as to whether each Vermont school is meeting quality standards and to implement certain consequences for low performing schools after two years instead of four years; stipulates that for the next school year, a homeless child may be educated in the school of origin despite Vermont law that stipulates that a homeless child shall be educated where the child is living; and establishes a committee to oversee implementation of the federal No Child Left Behind Act. http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/legdoc.cfm?URL=/docs/2004/acts/ACT064.HTM The general assembly finds that: the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB), has the potential to dramatically change the way education services are provided in Vermont; (2) Implementation of NCLB could have a major impact on the revenues of the state and the cost of education to Vermont taxpayers. NCLB provides the state of Vermont with over $50 million in federal funds for fiscal year 2004, most of which is the consolidation of past federal aid programs. It is unclear whether federal funds will be enough to implement the provisions of the Act with some estimates indicating the potential for large unfunded mandates at both the state and local levels; and (3) Without legislative oversight, virtually all decisions regarding how the act will be implemented could be made by the state board of education as it is the agency charged with working with the federal government to align Vermont's education system with provisions of federal law. Therefore, it is the intent of the general assembly to establish a no child left behind oversight committee for the purpose of:
(1) reviewing any NCLB–related request for proposal process. It is the intent of the general assembly that the department of education shall consider approaching other states prior to issuing an NCLB–related request for proposal to determine if a joint contract would be more cost effective; (2) receiving notification of any NCLB–related contract, grant agreement, amended contract, or amended grant agreement of greater than $10,000.00 prior to awarding any funds under the contract or grant agreement; (3) developing a process for reviewing significant state board or commissioner of education decisions regarding implementation of NCLB; (4) reviewing information about technical assistance that the department of education is providing to Vermont schools and school districts regarding implementation of NCLB; (5) proposing recommendations to the state board and commissioner of education and the legislature about any future decisions regarding implementation of NCLB; (6) by December 15, 2003, proposing recommendations to the senate and house committees on education and appropriations to ensure that neither the state nor local school districts will incur costs to implement NCLB other than those funded by the federal government; and (7) receiving reports from the commissioner of education on his or her best estimate of the costs of implementing NCLB at the state level in January of 2004 and 2005.
Title: S.B. 185
Source: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs
| |
| CO | Vetoed 05/2003 | P-12 | Suspends the administration of the reading and mathematics assessments for students in the ninth grade and the curriculum based, achievement college entrance exam to students in the eleventh grade. http://www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/olls/sl2003a/2003SLSEN.htm; http://www.leg.state.co.us/2003a/pubhome.nsf
Title: S.B. 292
Source: Colorado State Web site
| |
| CO | Vetoed 05/2003 | P-12 | Concerns a suspension of the administration of statewide assessments in writing. http://www.leg.state.co.us/2003a/inetcbill.nsf/fsbillcont/C2AD9B7F773A7D3287256CCB00775965?Open&file=309_enr.pdf
Title: S.B. 309
Source: Colorado Legislative Web site
| |
| IA | Vetoed Sec. Five 05/2003 | P-12 | Creates statewide testing and reporting system. Assigns unique identifier to each student in grades K through 12. Requires department to maintain a Web site reporting 1) Iowa test of basic skills scores for every district that administers the test, and for every school serving children in grades 3-8; and 2) Iowa test of educational development scores for every district that administers the test and every school serving students in grades 9-11. Specifies that scores are to be reported in percentiles to permit comparisons between schools. Requires department to adopt a value-added system to annually determine the academic growth of every student, school and district in reading and math, and other core academic subjects when possible. Specifies components that system must include.
http://www.legis.state.ia.us/GA/80GA/Session.1/HJournal/02200/02251.html and section 5: http://www.legis.state.ia.us/cgi-bin/Legislation/File_only.pl?FILE=/usr/ns-home/docs/GA/80GA/Legislation/HF/00500/HF00549/030508.html
Title: H.B. 549 (omnibus bill)
Source: www.legis.state.ia.us
| |
| MN | Signed into law 05/2003 | P-12 | Effective the 2003-04 school year and later, bars the state education commissioner from implementing the profile of learning portion of the state's results-oriented graduation rule, or classroom assessments that schools must use. Replaces references to "results oriented graduation rule" with "academic standards." (Retains requirement that students pass basic skills test to be eligible for high school graduation.) Requires students to complete district-determined course credit requirements to be eligible for high school graduation starting with students entering the ninth grade during the 2004-05 school year.
Establishes language arts, math, science, social studies and the arts as subject areas required for statewide accountability. Requires public elementary and middle schools to offer at least three and require at least two of the following four arts areas: dance, music, theater and visual arts. Requires public high schools to offer at least three and require at least one of the following five arts areas: media arts, dance, music, theater and visual arts. Requires the commissioner to submit proposed science and social studies standards to the legislature by February 1, 2004. Requires the commissioner to consider recommendations from specified stakeholders when developing state academic standards in language arts, math, science, social studies and the arts. Specifies that standards must: (1) be clear, concise, objective, measurable, and grade-level appropriate; (2) not require a specific teaching methodology or curriculum; and (3) be consistent with the constitutions of the United States and the state of Minnesota. Requires the commissioner to adopt rules for implementing statewide rigorous core academic standards in language arts, math and the arts. Specifies that after the rules are initially adopted, the commissioner may not amend or repeal these rules nor adopt new rules on the same topic without specific legislative authorization. Requires these academic standards to be implemented for all students beginning in the 2003-2004 school year. Additionally requires the commissioner to supplement the required state academic standards with grade-level benchmarks, although high school benchmarks may cover more than one grade. Establishes other requirements regarding benchmarks.
Requires every district to establish its own standards in the elective subject areas of health and physical education, vocational and technical education, and world languages. Requires every district to offer courses in all above elective subject areas, and to use a locally selected assessment to determine whether a student has achieved an elective standard. Additionally requires every district, by the 2007-08 school year, to adopt graduation requirements that meet or exceed state graduation requirements. Must provide students who enter grade 9 in or before the 2003-04 school year the opportunity to earn a diploma based on existing local graduation requirements in effect when student entered ninth grade.
Establishes graduation requirements based on course credits in language arts, math, science, social studies and electives, including the arts, for students entering grade 9 in the 2004-05 school year.
Beginning the 2005-06 school year and later, requires annual statewide testing in language arts and math in grades 3 through 8 and at the high school level. Also requires annual science assessments in one grade in grades 3-5 span, the grades 6-9 span, and the grades 10-12 span for the 2007-08 school year and later. Requires a state-developed test in a subject other than writing, developed after the 2002-03 school year, to include both multiple choice and constructed response questions. Requires state tests to be aligned with state academic standards, and for statewide results to be aggregated at the school and district level. Deletes language excluding test scores of students receiving limited English proficiency instruction from school and district testing results. Permits exemption of limited English proficiency students if the student has been in the United States for fewer than three years. Requires state assessments, by the 2006-07 school year to include a value-added component to measure student achievement growth over time. Requires commissioner to include alternative assessments for the very few students with disabilities for whom statewide assessments are inappropriate and for students with limited English proficiency.
Permits school, district or charter school to use a high school student's performance on a state assessment as a percentage of the student's final grade in a course or to place the student's assessment score on the student's transcript.
Requires the commissioner to develop language arts, math and science assessments aligned with state standards, which districts must use. Specifies that commissioner must not develop state assessments for academic standards in social studies and the arts.
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/getbill.pl?session=ls83&version=latest&number=HF302&session_number=0&session_year=2003
Title: H.F. 302 (multiple provisions)
Source: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us
| |
| NY | Proposed Rule 05/2003 | P-12 | Establishes criteria for the identification and assessment of students with limited English proficiency through use of the Language Assessment Battery-Revised test and the New York State English as a Second Language Test. Establishes curriculum and reporting requirements for such students. NEW YORK REG 15847 (SN)
Title: 8 NYCRR 154
Source: StateNet
| |
| OH | Rule Adoption 05/2003 | P-12 | New definition states that a highly qualified teacher is one who holds at least a bachelor's degree and has full state certification through a Board-approved certificate or license, such as a professional teaching license for Pre K-3 or 4-9 at the elementary level, or for K-12 or 7-12 at the middle and secondary level. Also has conditions for teachers who are new and not new to their particular fields and for teachers who have an alternative educator license. Teachers who are not considered to be highly qualified include those who hold conditional permits or temporary licenses, and those teaching outside their field. Passed a resolution of intent to adopt model curricula for math and English Language Arts for the purpose of meeting the requirements of 3301.07.09. Also passed resolution to establish "basic" and "below basic" levels of skill for the 4th -grade proficiency test in mathematics, writing, scence and citizenship and for the 6th-grade proficiency tests in reading, mathematics, writing, science and citizenship for the purpose of implementing the performance index that is a component of Ohio's statewide school building and school district accountability system. OHIO REG 10455 (SN) http://www.ode.state.oh.us/board/meetings/april03/minutes.asp and http://onlinedocs.andersonpublishing.com/oh/lpExt.dll/OAC/4b31/4d32/4d49?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0
Title: OAC 3301-24-05
Source: StateNet
| |
| OK | Signed into law 05/2003 | P-12 | Brings the state testing program in compliance with the No Child Left Behind Act. The measure institutes the testing configuration:
3rd: Reading, Math
4th: Reading, Math
5th: Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, Writing
6th: Reading, Math
7th: Reading, Math, Geography
8th: Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies
3rd - 8th: Arts Assessment
Secondary Level: End of Course Tests in English II, Algebra I, Biology I, U.S. History
All tests are criterion-referenced based on state academic standards adopted by the state board in the Priority Academic Student Skills.
Testing window dates will be set as near to the end of the course as possible, with testing results to be delivered to the school districts before the beginning of the next school year. Per federal requirements, the test results will be disaggregated by gender, race, ethnicity, disability status, migrant status, English proficiency, and status as economically disadvantaged. HB 1414 also requires the state board to implement an
accountability system based on the state Academic Performance Index with a system of recognition, rewards, sanctions and technical assistance and abolishes the connotations of low-performing and high challenge schools. http://www2.lsb.state.ok.us/2003-04HB/hb1414_enr.rtf
Title: H.B. 1414 (Assessment Component)
Source: http://www2.lsb.state.ok.us
| |
| TX | Signed into law 05/2003 | P-12 | A special education student can be exempted from the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) and given an alternative assessment instrument if the student receives modified instruction in the essential knowledge and skills and the TAKS would not provide an appropriate measure of student achievement. H.B. 447 provides that a special education student must receive modified instruction in the essential knowledge and skills for the assessed subject in order to be assessed with the alternative assessment instrument. http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/cgi-bin/tlo/textframe.cmd?LEG=78&SESS=R&CHAMBER=H&BILLTYPE=B&BILLSUFFIX=00447&VERSION=5&TYPE=B
Title: H.B. 447
Source: http://www.capitol.state.tx.us
| |
| AR | Signed into law 04/2003 | P-12 | Amends §§ 6-15-420 - 6-15-429. Requires the state board to establish a clear concise system of reporting the academic performance of each school on the state mandated criterion reference exam which conforms with the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Requires the state board to develop policy requiring the Department of Education to implement a program for identifying, evaluation, assisting and addressing school district failing to meet established levels of achievement mandated states as required in the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment, and Accountability Program (§§ 6-15-402 - 6-15-406). http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/ftproot/bills/2003/public/HB2697.pdf
Title: H.B. 2697 (Omnibus Bill)
Source: Arkansas Legislative Web site
| |
| AR | Signed into law 04/2003 | P-12 | Amends §§ 6-15-402 - 6-15-406. Creates the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment, and Accountability Program Act; including requiring the State Board of Education to establish standards defining what students should know in content areas and a system for reporting schools' performance on state mandated exams to comply with No Child Left Behind; requires the State Board to develop a mandatory school readiness screening system for kindergarten students; requires a school improvement system. http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/ftproot/bills/2003/public/HB2697.pdf
Title: H.B. 2697 (Omnibus Bill)
Source: Arkansas Legislative Web site
| |
| ND | Signed into law 04/2003 | P-12 | Relates to assessment of public school students in reading, mathematics and science. From the Fiscal Note: SB 2065 requires the state to develop and implement state assessments in reading/English language arts, mathematics, and science in identified grades as established by a specified schedule. The fiscal impact from SB 2065 falls entirely on the state. School districts are responsible for the administration of the state assessments within their proscribed instructional periods; therefore, there are no additional costs that impact local schools.
Costs associated with the development and implementation of the state assessments include: the development of state content standards, the development of state achievement standards, the alignment of state content standards with test items; the development of future test items, the administration of the actual assessments to students; the scoring of student tests; the establishment of achievement cut scores related to the state achievement standards; the printing and dissemination of reports to students, schools, districts, and the state; the development of school and district Report Cards and Profiles; the use of student data analysis and reporting applications, and associated professional development and technical assistance to schools. A state advisory committee has concurred with the Department of Public Instruction's identification of these development and administration activities. Listed below is an outline of the projected costs associated with the state assessment program.
Activity 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Standards Development: 350,000 275,000 50,000 50,000 350,000
Assessment Development: 800,000 2,480,000 3,310,000 4,150,000 3,950,000
State Accountability Initiatives: 1,500,000 1,050,000 950,000 300,000 300,000
Total 2,650,000 3,805,000 4,310,000 4,500,000 4,600,000
These projections may vary depending on the final determination of contract negotiations, unanticipated costs or
savings, schedule delays or postponements, or other associated project activities. Fiscal Note: http://www.state.nd.us/lr/assembly/58-2003/fiscal_notes/DQVU0500.pdf; bill text: http://www.state.nd.us/lr/assembly/58-2003/bill_actions/BA2065.html
Title: S.B. 2065
Source: http://www.state.nd.us
| |
| NM | Signed into law 03/2003 | P-12 | Adds Section 22-2A-3 and Section 22-2A-4. Requires the state board to adopt content and performance standards in mathematics, reading and language arts, science and social studies. Section 22-2A-4 requries the state board to establish a statewide assessment and performance standards and that measures adequate yearly progress for each student, public school and district. Testing requirements: (1) for grades kindergarten through two, diagnostic and standards-based tests on reading that include phonemic awareness, phonics and comprehension by the 2003-2004 school year; (2) for grades three through nine and for grade eleven, standards-based academic performance tests in mathematics, reading and language arts and social studies by the 2005-2006 school year; provided that testing in ninth grade and testing in social studies shall not occur until the legislature has provided funding for test development and implementation; (3) for grades four, six, eight and eleven, standards-based academic performance writing tests by the 2005-2006 school year and (4) for one of grades three through five and six through nine and for grade eleven, standards-based academic performance tests in science by the 2007-2008 school year. C. The department shall involve appropriate licensed school employees in the development of the standardsbased academic performance tests. D. All students shall participate in the academic assessment program. The state board shall adopt standards for reasonable accommodations in academic testing for students with disabilities and limited English proficiency, including when and how accommodations may be applied. The legislative education study committee shall review the standards prior to adoption by the state board. E. Students who have been determined to be limited English proficient may be allowed to take the standards-based academic performance test in their primary language. A student who has attended school for three consecutive years in the United States shall participate in the English language reading test unless granted a waiver by the department based on criteria set by the state board. New section 22-13-1 itemizes minimum instructional areas for accreditation, including graduation requirements.
http://legis.state.nm.us/Sessions/03%20Regular/FinalVersions/house/HB0212MarkedUp.pdf
Title: H.B. 212 (Omnibus Bill)
Source: New Mexico State Legislature
| |
| NM | Signed into law 03/2003 | P-12 | Amends 22-1-2 to add new definition: "adequate yearly progress" means the measure adopted by the state board based on federal requirements to assess the progress that a student, a public school or school district or the state makes toward improving student achievement. Adds Section 22-2A-5. Requires the state board to adopt the process and methodology for determing adequate yearly progress. The statewide standards-based academic performance tests used to assess adequate yearly progress shall be valid and reliable and shall conform with nationally recognized professional and technical standards. Academic performance shall be measured by school and by the following subgroups:
A. ethnicity;
B. race;
C. limited English proficiency;
D. students with disabilities;
http://legis.state.nm.us/Sessions/03%20Regular/FinalVersions/house/HB0212MarkedUp.pdf
Title: H.B. 212 (Omnibus Bill)
Source: New Mexico Legislature
| |
| SD | Signed into law 03/2003 | P-12 | Requires participation in the national assessment of educational progress.
Title: S.B. 38
Source: StateNet
| |
| SD | Signed into law 02/2003 | P-12 | Revises the achievement assessments required in public schools, and the grades to be assessed.
Title: S.B. 39
Source: StateNet
| |
| OH | Adopted 01/2003 | P-12 | Board adopted the design for a statewide school building and school district accountability system, which is officially entitled "Ohio's Proposal for a Unitary Accountability System." The measure puts the board on track to fulfill the requirements of the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," which requires states to have "a single statewide State accountability system that will be effective in ensuring that all local educational agencies, public elementary schools, and public secondary schools make adequate yearly progress…" A copy of the accountability plan as adopted by the state board is available on the Ohio Department of Education's web page at the following address: www.ode.state.oh.us/Accountability/default.asp
Title: Resolution
Source: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/board/meetings/january03/minutes.asp
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Choice/Transfer |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Consequences for Schools |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Finance |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Parent Involvement |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Report Cards |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--School Support |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Supplemental Services |
| |
| Online Learning--Digital/Blended Learning |
| |
| Online Learning--Virtual Schools/Courses |
| |
| P-16 or P-20 |
| |
| P-3 |
| |
| P-3 Child Care |
| |
| P-3 Early Intervention (0-3) |
| |
| P-3 Ensuring Quality |
| |
| P-3 Family Involvement |
| |
| P-3 Finance |
| |
| P-3 Governance |
| |
| P-3 Grades 1-3 |
| |
| P-3 Kindergarten |
| |
| P-3 Kindergarten--Full-Day Kindergarten |
| |
| P-3 Preschool |
| |
| P-3 Teaching Quality/Professional Development |
| |
| Parent/Family |
| |
| Parent/Family--Parent Rights |
| |
| Postsecondary |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability--Accreditation |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability--Diploma Mills |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Financial Aid |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees--Prepd/College Savings Plans |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees--Undocumented Immigrants |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Compensation |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Intellectual Property |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Tenure |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance |
| |
| Postsecondary Governance and Structures |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--Community/Technical Colleges |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--For-Profit/Proprietary |
| |
| Postsecondary Online Instruction |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Access |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Admissions Requirements |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Disabled |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Completion |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Developmental/Remediation |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Transfer/Articulation |
| |
| Private Schools |
| |
| Privatization |
| |
| Promotion/Retention |
| |
| Public Attitudes |
| |
| Public Involvement |
| |
| Reading/Literacy |
| |
| Religion |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Day/Class Length |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Extended Day Programs |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Summer School |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Week |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Year |
| |
| School Safety |
| |
| School Safety--Bullying Prevention/Conflict Resolution |
| |
| School Safety--Expulsion/Suspension |
| |
| School Safety--No Child Left Behind--Safe Schools |
| |
| School Safety--Sexual Harassment and Assault |
| |
| School Safety--Special Education |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--District Consolidation/Deconsolidation |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Facilities |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Food Service |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Libraries |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Personnel (Non-Teaching) |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Shared Services |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Transportation |
| |
| Service-Learning |
| |
| Special Education |
| |
| Special Education--Federal Law/Regulations |
| |
| Special Education--Finance |
| |
| Special Education--Inclusion (Mainstreaming) |
| |
| Special Education--Placement |
| |
| Special Education--Transition |
| |
| Special Populations--Corrections Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Gifted and Talented |
| |
| Special Populations--Homeless Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Immigrant Education |
| |
| Standards |
| |
| Standards--Implementation |
| |
| State Longitudinal Data Systems |
| |
| State Policymaking |
| |
| State Policymaking--Ballot Questions |
| |
| State Policymaking--Politics |
| |
| State Policymaking--Task Forces/Commissions |
| |
| Student Achievement |
| |
| Student Achievement--Closing the Achievement Gap |
| |
| Student Supports--Counseling/Guidance |
| |
| Student Supports--Mentoring/Tutoring |
| |
| Student Supports--Remediation |
| |
| Students |
| |
| Students--Athletics/Extracurricular Activities |
| |
| Students--Employment |
| |
| Students--Mobility |
| |
| Students--Records/Rights |
| |
| Teaching Quality |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Alternative |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Assignment |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Highly Qualified Teachers |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Natl. Bd. for Prof. Teach. Stds. |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Special Education |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--State Prof. Standards Bds. |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Substitute Teachers |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay--Pay-for-Performance |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay--Retirement/Benefits |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Evaluation and Effectiveness |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Induction Programs and Mentoring |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Paraprofessionals |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Preparation |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Professional Development |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention--At-Risk Schools |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Teacher Rights |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Tenure or Continuing Contract |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Unions/Collective Bargaining |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Unions/Collective Bargaining--Strikes |
| |
| Technology |
| |
| Technology--Devices/Software/Hardware |
| |
| Technology--Equitable Access |
| |
| Technology--Funding Issues |
| |
| Technology--Internet Safety |
| |
| Textbooks and Open Source |
| |
| Urban--Governance |
| |