 |
State |
Status/Date |
Level |
Summary |
|
 | Accountability |
| |
| Accountability--Accreditation |
| |
| Accountability--Measures/Indicators |
| |
| Accountability--Reporting Results |
| |
| Accountability--Rewards |
| |
 | Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions |
| |
| NM | Adopted 12/2009 | P-12 | Establishes requirements for demonstrating 9th grade math & reading proficiency and meeting school attendance standards prior to receiving an MVD driving permit for the year 2011.
http://www.nmcpr.state.nm.us/nmac/parts/title06/06.030.0011.htm
Title: NMAC 6.30.11
Source: http://www.nmcpr.state.nm.us/nmac/
| |
| GA | Adopted 11/2009 | P-12 | Adds that retention of students for athletic purposes is prohibited. Repeals rule 160-5-1-.19 "Grades 6-8: Competitive Interscholastic Activities" and adds provisions related to no pass no play for middle grades students to rule 160 -5-1-.18. Requires students participating in competitive interscholastic activities to pass at least 70% of courses carrying credit toward grade promotion in the semester immediately preceding participation. Requires all students who participate in competitive interscholastic athletics or cheerleading to have an annual physical examination prior to participation. Adds eligibility provisions specific to students with disabilities and children of military families. http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-5-1-.18.pdf
Title: GAC 160 -5-1-.18, -.19
Source: www.doe.k12.ga.us
| |
| IL | Adopted 11/2009 | P-12 | Partially from "Notice of Adopted Amendments" in Illinois Register (changes from this rulemaking but not listed below are technical in nature or echo recent changes in legislation):
Section 1.20: Revised to distinguish among the appropriate levels of sign-off on the corrective plan a district must submit depending on whether a school or the district has been placed on probation. Adds a provision allowing a district's or school's status to be changed to "nonrecognized" if, at any time that a corrective action plan is in effect, the state superintendent determines that the agreed-upon actions are not being implemented in accordance with the plan or the underlying areas of noncompliance are not being remedied.
Section 1.30: Updated to refer to state assessment accommodations now allowed for limited English proficient students, and now specifies when time extensions will be made available to those students (in response to P.A. 94-642, which authorized the state board to allow additional time "by rule"). Revises labels used to describe scores on the Illinois Alternate Assessment, and updates rule on review and verification of assessment information.
Section 1.100: Adds details so that staff of districts and other eligible applicants will have more specific guidance as to what is expected as part of the process for receiving waivers and modifications of requirements in the school code or administrative rules.
Section 1.240: Expanded to include a reference to gender identity among the prohibited bases for discrimination because it may otherwise not be clear that gender identity is encompassed in the definition of "sexual orientation".
Section 1.420: Adds provision specifying that each district's plan for recording student progress and/or awarding credit must include credit for courses completed by correspondence, online or from other external sources. Specifies that a district may count four clock-hours as a day of instruction only due to a condition beyond the district's control; specifies other requirements that must be met for the state superintendent to approve a district's request to use "multiple sessions" to fulfill school day requirements. Specifies that students in attendance for at least 150 but fewer than 240 minutes of school work may be counted for a half-day of attendance; students in attendance for fewer than 150 minutes of school work are not to be counted for purposes of calculating average daily attendance. Emphasizes the meaning of the portion of the rule on library media programs that distinguishes between the services that may be performed only by certified library information specialists and the other tasks that may be inherent in districts' operation of their programs.
Section 1.465 (on awarding of credit for foreign language study in an ethnic school program) and 1.480 (on correctional institution educational programs): Generally updated, including the insertion of current statutory citations.
Section 1.510: Main revision conveys state board's interpretation that districts may not pick and choose among students in the same situation once they elect to transport some students.
Section 1.737: Updated to complement new requirements for endorsements in safety and driver education that will take effect in 2012.
Pages 324-388 of 432: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register_volume33_issue45.pdf
Title: 23 IAC 1.20, .30, .100, .240, .420, .465, .480, .510, .737
Source: www.cyberdriveillinois.com
| |
| CA | Signed into law 08/2009 | P-12 | Requires an employer advisory board to recommend measures, criteria and methods to evaluate the skills and knowledge of students in a regional occupation center or program established and maintained by a county board of education. Requires an employer advisory board to assist a regional occupational center or program in identifying scholarships. Prohibits funding redirection to other centers or programs while a center or program is in corrective action. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0601-0650/sb_640_bill_20090806_chaptered.pdf
Title: S.B. 640
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| IL | Signed into law 08/2009 | P-12 | Authorizes a district under the authority of a Financial Oversight Panel to appoint a district superintendent with a specified certification or a chief executive officer upon expiration of the current superintendent's contract. Requires the superintendent or chief executive officer to undergo approval by the Financial Oversight Panel.
Provides that, in lieu of a Financial Oversight Panel Financial Administrator, a district may appoint a chief fiscal officer who shall have the powers and duties of the district's chief school business official and any other duties assigned by the school board or Financial Oversight Panel. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/96/HB/PDF/09600HB2674lv.pdf
Title: H.B. 2674
Source: www.ilga.gov
| |
| IL | Signed into law 07/2009 | P-12 | Increases statewide charter school cap and charter school cap for Chicago. Above and beyond caps, permits five Chicago charters (and specified numbers of campuses and enrollment seats within those five charters) to be devoted to serving returning high school dropouts. Requires charter schools to submit to the state board of education a copy of their audit and Form 990. Increases time frame for state board to approve a charter school proposal. Adds procedures for a charter school to respond to a proposed revocation of its charter. Beginning with the 2012-13 school year, requires at least 75% of instructional staff in established charter schools to hold teacher certification; for charter schools established after these provisions are enacted, requires 75% of instructional staff to be certified by the beginning of the 4th school year in which students are enrolled in the school. Provides charter schools statewide are exempt from caps on the number of employees who may be enrolled in alternative certification programs. Requires state board to report findings of charter school evaluation every two years rather than annually. Establishes an Independent Charter School Authorizer Task Force to study the need for an independent charter school authorizer in the state. Directs the task force to report its findings and recommendations to the governor and legislature by January 2010.
Defines "contract school" as a Chicago attendance center run by a for- or not-for-profit private entity on contract to provide instructional and other services to a majority of the students enrolled in the attendance center. Defines "contract turnaround school" as an experimental Chicago contract school created to implement alternative governance in an attendance center subject to restructuring or similar intervention under NCLB that has not made adequate yearly progress (AYP) for 5 consecutive years. Provides that a Chicago school placed on probation that fails to make adequate progress in correcting deficiencies after one year may be converted to a contract turnaround school. Specifies the Chicago school board may operate no more than 30 contract schools, plus up to 5 contract turnaround schools. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB0612lv.pdf
Title: S.B. 612
Source: www.ilga.gov
| |
| LA | Vetoed 07/2009 | P-12 | Specifies criteria that exempts a school from being transferred to the state-run Recovery School District, even if the school is low performing.
http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=664617
Title: H.B. 495
Source: http://www.legis.state.la.us/
| |
| OH | Signed into law 07/2009 | P-12 | Provides that a separate accountability compliance commission must be established for each school district for which the state superintendent opts to establish a commission due to noncompliance with financial budgeting or reporting requirements per section 3306.33. Establishes protocols for accountability compliance commissions. Provides the commission may do any of the following:
(1) Prepare and submit the school district's spending plan required under section 3306.30 and, if applicable, section 3306.31
(2) Appoint school building administrators and reassign administrative personnel
(3) Terminate the contracts of administrators or administrative personnel
(4) Contract with a private entity to perform school or district management functions
(5) Establish a district budget and approve district appropriations and expenditures, unless a financial planning and supervision commission has been established for the district
(6) Exercise the powers, duties and functions with respect to the district as are granted to a financial planning and supervision commission, unless a financial planning and supervision commission has been established for the district.
Directs each commission to seek local board input on means to improve district operations and compliance with state requirements, but clarifies that any decision of the commission related to any authority granted the commission by statute is final. Provides that if any board of a district for which an accountability compliance commission has been established renews any collective bargaining agreement, the board cannot enter into any agreement that would render any decision of the commission unenforceable. Provides that an accountability compliance commission will cease to exist at the beginning of the first year that none of the circumstances described in division (A) of section 3306.33 apply to the district. Pages 1111-1113 of 3120: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/BillText128/128_HB_1_EN_N.pdf
Title: H.B. 1 - Section 3306.34
Source: www.legislature.state.oh.us
| |
| OH | Signed into law 07/2009 | P-12 | By July 2011, directs the department of education to provide technical assistance to that either has failed to comply with any applicable expenditure or reporting standard prescribed by rule adopted under section 3306.25, or that fails to submit a spending plan under section 3306.30 and, if applicable, section 3306.31, in order to bring the district into compliance with expenditure and reporting standards. Also requires such a district to develop and submit to the department a three-year operations improvement plan; notify all parents of students of the standards or requirements that were not met, the actions being taken to meet the standards or requirements and any progress to date toward meeting requirements; and present the plan, and take public testimony with respect to it, in a public hearing before the board. Provides that if one of the triggers applies a second consecutive year, the department must provide technical assistance and the district must perform the aforementioned actions, plus the department must establish a state intervention team to evaluate all aspects of the district's operations, including management, instructional methods, resource allocation and scheduling, and make recommendations on methods for bringing the district into compliance with the applicable standards. Provides that if one of the triggers applies a third consecutive year, whether it is the same or different trigger as in preceding years, the state superintendent must establish an accountability compliance commission or appoint a trustee to manage the district in place of the local board until the beginning of the first year that neither of the triggers applies to the district. Provides that if either trigger applies for a fourth consecutive year, the state board must take action to revoke the district's charter.
Pages 1109-1111 of 3120: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/BillText128/128_HB_1_EN_N.pdf
Title: H.B. 1 - Section 3306.33
Source: www.legislature.state.oh.us
| |
| OH | Signed into law 07/2009 | P-12 | From DOE summary of H.B. 1: Revises the current performance criteria that trigger automatic closure of a community school after July 1, 2009, as follows: (1) For schools that do not offer a grade higher than 3, requires closure if the school has been in academic emergency for three of the four most recent years, instead of four consecutive years; (2) For schools that offer any of grades 4 to 8 but no grade higher than 9, requires closure if the school has been in academic emergency for two of the three most recent years, instead of three consecutive years, and has shown less than one year of academic growth in reading or mathematics for at least two of the three most recent years; (3) For a school that offers any of grades 10 to 12, requires closure if the school has been in academic emergency for three of the four most recent years, instead of three consecutive years with two years not showing two years of academic growth in reading or mathematics. Exempts from automatic closure any community school in which a majority of the enrolled students are children with disabilities receiving special education and related services.
DOE summary of H.B. 1: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/DocumentManagement/DocumentDownload.aspx?DocumentID=71635
Pages 1264-1265 of 3120: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/BillText128/128_HB_1_EN_N.pdf
Title: H.B. 1 - Section 3314.35
Source: www.ode.state.oh.us
| |
| OH | Adopted 06/2009 | P-12 | Rescinds and adopts new rules relating to school building and district improvement planning, parent notification and intervention. Requires districts and schools identified for improvement to be categorized as low support, medium support or high support based upon the aggregate percentage of students that do
not meet adequate yearly progress in reading and math. Establishes differentiated required actions for districts and buildings that have been identified as low, medium or high support. Establishes notification requirements for parents of students in low, medium and high support schools and districts. Adds that, in the case of a school or district that has failed to comply with specified accountability provisions, the department may withhold up to 10% of the school or district's Title I funds, and up to 5% of the school or district's annual foundation payment. Specifies funds may be withheld through the end of the current fiscal year or six months, whichever is longer, and may continue to be withheld each year until the school or district demonstrates compliance. Provides the the state superintendent of public instruction may require that districts and buildings provide documentation related to the implementation of the requirements of sections 3302.04 and 3302.041 of the Revised Code, including parent notifications and communications. http://www.registerofohio.state.oh.us/pdfs/3301/0/56/3301-56-01_PH_FF_N_RU_20090615_1020.pdf
Title: OAC 3301-13-01, -02, -37-01 thru -12, -56-01
Source: www.registerofohio.state.oh.us
| |
| TX | Signed into law 06/2009 | P-12 | Section 69: Adds new section 45.0531. Authorizes the state board by rule to establish a percentage of the cost value of the permanent school fund to be reserved from use in guaranteeing bonds.
Section 70: Requires districts seeking state guarantee of eligible bonds to use a form adopted by the commissioner for this purpose.
Section 71: Adds reference to credit enhancement.
Section 72: Authorizes the commissioner to order a district to set an ad valorem tax rate capable of producing an amount of revenue sufficient to allow the district to provide reimbursement to the permanent school fund and pay the principal of and interest on district bonds as the principal and interest become due. Provides that if a district fails to comply with the commissioner's order, the commissioner may impose any sanctions ennumerated in "Accreditation Sanctions," Subchapter G, Chapter 39, including appointment of a board of managers or annexation to another district, regardless of the district's accreditation status or the duration of a particular accreditation status. Pages 69-72 of 108: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB03646F.pdf
Title: H.B. 3646 - Sections 69-72
Source: www.legis.state.tx.us
| |
| TX | Signed into law 06/2009 | P-12 | Clarifies language in Section 11.203 regarding participation in the school leadership pilot program for principals. Specifies that an individual serving as principal of a school rated academically unacceptable the previous school year must participate in the program. Eliminates requirement that the person hired to replace such a principal participate in the school leadership pilot program the year following a school's rating as academically unacceptable. Page 11 of 180: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB00003F.pdf
Title: H.B. 3 - Section 9
Source: www.legis.state.tx.us
| |
| TX | Signed into law 06/2009 | P-12 | Amends action that triggers a teacher's participation in a teacher reading academy. Former provision required teacher to participate in reading academy if teacher provided instruction in reading, math, science or social studies to students in any grades 6-8 and campus was considered "academically unacceptable." New provision deletes "academically unacceptable" and requires participation in reading academy if campus failed to satisfy any standard under Section 39.054(d).
New 39.054(d) standards: Page 80 of 180: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB00003F.pdf
Section 24: Page 24 of 180: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB00003F.pdf
Title: H.B. 3 - Section 24
Source: www.legis.state.tx.us
| |
| TX | Signed into law 06/2009 | P-12 | Directs a campus intervention team to assist a reconstituted campus in developing an *updated targeted* improvement plan (former language called for development of a "school improvement plan") and in submitting the updated targeted improvement plan to the local board of trustees for approval and presenting the plan in a public hearing as provided by Section 39.106(e-1). Allows the principal of a reconstituted school to remain the principal if the campus intervention team determines that the principal's retention would be more beneficial to student achievement and campus stability than removal.
Provides that for each year a reconstituted campus has an unacceptable performance rating, a campus intervention team must assist in updating the targeted improvement plan to identify areas of growth and areas that require improvement, submit the updated plan to the local board of trustees and the parents of campus students, and assist in submitting the updated plan to the commissioner for approval. Authorizes the commissioner to appoint a monitor, conservator, management team or board of managers to ensure and oversee district-level support to low-performing campuses in a district with one or more reconstituted schools. Provides that in making appointments for this purpose or for oversight of implementation of updated targeted improvement plans, the commissioner must consider individuals who have demonstrated success in managing campuses with student populations similar to the campus at which the individual appointed will serve.
Provides that a trigger for alternative management or closure of a reconstituted school may be failure of students at the campus to demonstrate substantial improvement in the areas targeted by the updated plan. Provides that a reconstituted school's continued inadequate student achievement or failure to fully implement the updated targeted improvement plan may also result in "repurposing" of the campus. Requires a campus with an unacceptable performance rating for three consecutive years after reconstitution to either be repurposed or closed, or undergo alternative management. Provides an exception to this provision for up to one school year if the commissioner determines that, on the basis of significant improvement in student performance over the preceding two school years, the campus is likely to be assigned an acceptable
performance rating for the following school year.
Adds language establishing procedures for "repurposing" a campus. Requires the district to develop a repurposing plan, which must be approved by the local board of trustees and the commissioner. Requires the plan to include a description of a rigorous and relevant academic program for the campus, and allows the plan to include various instructional models. Provides the commissioner may not approve a campus repurposing plan unless specified criteria are met, including that the principal and teachers are not retained at the campus, barring certain specified exceptions. Provides that an educator who is not retained at a repurposed campus may be assigned to another position in the district.
Authorizes the commissioner to solicit proposals from qualified for-profit entities for alternative management of a low-performing campus if a nonprofit entity has not responded to the commissioner 's request for proposals.
In reconstituting, repurposing, or imposing any other intervention or sanction on a campus, prohibits the name of the campus from being changed.
Establishes transitional interventions and sanctions to cover the period between enactment of 2009 H.B. 3, to be implemented in August 2013. Authorizes the commissioner to suspend assignment of accreditation statuses and performance ratings for the 2011-2012 school year. Provides such provisions expire September 1, 2014.
Pages 109-125 of 180: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB00003F.pdf
Title: H.B. 3 - Section 59 - Part V
Source: www.legis.state.tx.us
| |
| TX | Signed into law 06/2009 | P-12 | Amends language regarding actions the commissioner may take as regards a district that does not satisfy accreditation criteria, academic performance standards or any financial accountability standard. Provides that the commissioner may order the preparation of a student achievement improvement plan that addresses each student achievement indicator under Section 39.053(c) for which district performance is insufficient. Provides that if a district fails to satisfy any standard under Section 39.054(e), the commissioner may appoint a board of managers to exercise the powers and duties of the board of trustees. Provides that if for two consecutive years a district has failed to satisfy any standard under Section 39.054(e), the commissioner may revoke the district's accreditation and order the district's annexation to an adjoining district or, in the case of a home-rule district or charter school, order closure of all programs operated under the district's or school's charter. Specifies several potential sanctions for a district that fails to satisfy any standard under Section 39.054(e) due to the district's dropout rates.
Amends language regarding actions the commissioner may take as regards a campus whose performance is below any standard under Section 39.054(e). Repeals provision allowing the commissioner to permit the campus to participate in an innovative redesign of the campus to improve campus performance. Repeals language establishing certain sanctions for low-performing campuses (e.g., ordering a hearing by the local board of trustees at the campus, ordering the preparation of a report on campus's parental involvement program, ordering a report on the effectiveness of the district- and campus-level planning and decision-making committees, ordering the preparation, state approval and implmementation of a student improvement plan).
Adds that if a campus performance is below any standard under Section 39.054(e), the commissioner may establish a school community partnership team that includes members of the campus-level planning and
decision-making committee and additional community representatives. Provides that if the commissioner determines that a campus subject to interventions or sanctions has implemented substantially similar intervention measures under federal accountability requirements, the commissioner may accept the substantially similar intervention measures as measures in compliance with state-level sanctions/interventions policy.
Amends provisions relating to a campus whose performance satisfies performance standards under Section 39.054(e) for the current school year but that would not satisfy performance standards under Section 39.054(e) if the standards to be used for the following school year were applied to the current school year. Provides that on the commissioner's request, the campus-level committee must revise and submit to the commissioner the portions of the campus improvement plan that are relevant to those areas for which the campus would not satisfy performance standards. Provides that if the campus is a charter school, the campus must establish a campus-level planning and decision-making committee and develop a campus improvement plan. On the commissioner's request, directs the charter school to submit to the commissioner the portions of the campus improvement plan that are relevant to those areas for which the campus would not satisfy performance standards.
Amends provisions related to campus intervention teams. Requires the commisioner to assign any campus whose performance is below any standard under Section 39.054(e) a campus intervention team. Requires the team, with the involvement of the school community partnership team, if applicable, to conduct a targeted on-site needs assessment relevant to an area of insufficient performance or, if the commissioner determines necessary, a comprehensive on-site needs assessment (former language called for a comprehensive on-site needs assessments for low-performing schools). Directs a campus intervention team to develop a *targeted* improvement plan (former language called for creation of "school improvement plan for student achievement"). Additionally directs the campus intervention team to assist the campus in submitting the targeted improvement plan to the board of trustees for approval and presenting the plan in a public hearing. Clarifies that teams must use *all* of enumerated guidelines and procedures relevant to each area of insufficient performance in conducting a targeted on-site needs assessment, and must use each of the enumerated guidelines and procedures in conducting a comprehensive on-site needs assessment. Adds that all targeted (as appropriate) and comprehensive on-site needs assessments must include (1) an assessment of the percentage of teachers who are fully certified, (2) an assessment of the extent and quality of the mentoring program for teachers with less than two years teaching experience in the subject or grade level to which they are assigned, and (3) a comparison of findings of specified elements against other campuses serving the same grade levels in the district or to other campuses within the campus's comparison group if there are no other campuses within the district serving the same grade levels as the campus. Provides that if the campus has a school community partnership team, the campus intervention team must seek the involvement and advice of the partnership team in recommending actions relating to any area of insufficient performance. Adds teacher recruitment and retention strategies as an area upon which the campus intervention team and school community partnership team may make recommendations following completion of the on-site needs assessment. Provides that in executing a targeted improvement plan, the campus intervention team must, if appropriate, require the district to develop a teacher recruitment and retention plan to address the qualifications and retention of the teachers at the campus.
Directs the campus intervention team to help the campus submit the targeted improvement plan to the commissioner for approval. Provides the commissioner may authorize a school community partnership team to supersede the authority of and satisfy the requirements of establishing and maintaining a campus-level planning and decision-making committee. Provides the commissioner may authorize a targeted improvement plan or updated plan to supersede the provisions of and satisfy the requirements of developing, reviewing and revising a campus improvement plan.
Updates language to provide that a campus intervention team must work with a campus with an unacceptable performance rating until the campus satisfies all performance standards under Section 39.054(e) for a two-year period (or a one-year period under certain circumstances). Provides that the campus intervention team must additionally assist the low-performing campus in updating the targeted improvement plan
to identify and analyze areas of growth and areas that require improvement, and submit each such updated plan to the district board of trustees. Directs the board of trustees to conduct a public hearing to inform the public and solicit public comment after a targeted improvement plan or updated plan is submitted, and to submit the targeted improvement plan or any updated plan to the commissioner for approval.
Pages 96-109 of 180: http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB00003F.pdf
Title: H.B. 3 - Section 59 - Part IV
Source: www.legis.state.tx.us
| |
| OK | Signed into law 05/2009 | P-12 | Requires schools identified as not making Adequate Yearly Progress to utilize school support team assistance; provides that the support team shall assist the school in incorporating strategies that will strengthen the core academic subjects and address specific academic issues, incorporating strategies to promote high quality professional development, and training teachers to analyze classroom and school-level data.
http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2009-10HB/HB1461_int.rtf
Title: H.B. 1461
Source: http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us
| |
| OK | Signed into law 05/2009 | P-12 | Requires district boards of education for schools identified for improvement for a specified number of consecutive years to implement alternative governance arrangements; provides that such arrangements include reopening the school as a public charter school, replacing the school staff, entering into a contract with a private management company, and other arrangements; provides that the state board of Education shall retain all funds that would have been allocated to the school upon failure to comply.
http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2009-10bills/SB/SB268_ENR.RTF
Title: S.B. 268
Source: http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us
| |
| NY | Signed into law 04/2009 | P-12 | Provides that a district that submitted a contract for excellence for the 2008-09 school year must submit a contract for excellence for the 2009-10 school year unless all schools in the district are identified as in good standing. Provides that a district that submitted a contract for excellence for 2007-08 and 2008-09 and that is required to submit a contract for excellence in 2009-10 but did not fully expend all of its 2007-08 foundation aid during the 2007-08 school year may reallocate and expend such unexpended funds in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 school years for allowable contract for excellence programs and activities.
Requires New York City school district to prepare a report to the commissioner by November 17, 2009 on the status of implemenetation of its plan to reduce average class sizes as required in the contract for excellence legislation. Specifies the information the report must provide about all schools that received class size reduction funds. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A00157&sh=t
Title: A.B. 157 - Part A, Sections 1-5
Source: assembly.state.ny.us
| |
| WA | Signed into law 04/2009 | P-12 | Section 501-507 relates to shared accountability for school and district improvement. Legislature recognizes that comprehensive education finance reform and increased investment of public resources necessary to implement that reform must be accompanied by a new mechanism for clearly defining the relationships and expectations for the state, school districts and schools. This will be accomplished through the development of a proactive, collaborative accountability system that focuses on a school improvement system that engages and serves the local school board, parents, students, staff in the school and districts and the community. Improvement system is to be based on progressive levels of support, with a goal of continuous improvement in student achievement and alignment with the federal system of accountability. It is the state's responsibility to provide schools and districts with the tools and resources necessary to improve student achievement. These tools include the necessary accounting and data reporting systems, assessment systems to monitor student achievement, and a system of general support, targeted assistance, recognition and, if necessary state intervention. Legislature has already charged the state board of education with developing criteria to identify schools and districts that are successful, in need of assistance and those where students persistently fail, as well as to identify a range of intervention strategies and a performance incentive system. State board is to develop an accountability index to identify schools and districts for recognition and for additional state support. Index is to be based on criteria that are fair, consistent and transparent. Performance is to be measured using multiple outcomes and indicators including, but not limited to, graduation rates and results from statewide assessments. Proposed system is to outline a process for addressing performance challenges that will include the following features: 1) an academic performance audit using peer review teams of educators that considers school and community factors in addition to other factors in developing recommended specific correction actions that should be undertaken to improve student learning; 2) a requirement for the local school board plan to develop and be responsible for implementation of corrective action plan taking into account the audit findings; and 3) monitoring of local district progress by the office of the superintendent of public instruction. Once the accountability index and state system of support is finalized, the superintendent of public instruction and the state board of education will seek approval from the U.S. Department of Education for use of the system in place of the federal accountability system under the No Child Left Behind Act.
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009-10/Pdf/Bills/House%20Passed%20Legislature/2261-S.PL.pdf
Title: H.B. 2261--Section 501-507, Accountability
Source: http://apps.leg.wa.gov
| |
| MS | Signed into law 03/2009 | P-12 | Prohibits public school students in 7th-12th grades who fail to maintain a cumulative GPA of 2.0 from participating in extracurricular activities. Authorizes and directs the state board to define failing schools and school districts under certain standards. Requires districts to develop and public certain annual reports prescribed by the state board. Authorizes the state board to request the governor to declare a state of emergency in a school district which meets the definition of a failing school district for two consecutive years. Establishes a recovery school district within the department of education under the direction of the superintendent to provide management and oversight for all districts that are subject to state conservator ship and to hear certain appeals from those districts. Provides for the annual audit of public school districts under the direction of the state auditor. Prescribes training requirements for school board members and superintendents in failing school districts. Requires districts receiving accreditation assistance from the department of education to implement programs specified by state superintendent. Directs the state auditor to conduct a review of the finances of any district determined to be in a serious financial condition and make an immediate report thereon. Clarifies that education employment procedures do not apply to any category of employee in a school district subject to a state conservatorship. Require districts with schools determined to be failing to establish community-based education councils that are accountable to the community. Provides for the removal of appointed or elected school superintendents of underperforming school districts under certain circumstances.
http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2009/pdf/SB/2600-2699/SB2628SG.pdf
Title: S.B. 2628
Source: http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions--No Pass No Drive |
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions--No Pass No Play |
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions--Takeovers |
| |
| Accountability--School Improvement |
| |
| Adult Basic Education |
| |
| Assessment |
| |
| Assessment--Accommodations |
| |
| Assessment--College Entrance Exams |
| |
| Assessment--Computer Based |
| |
| Assessment--End-of-Course |
| |
| Assessment--Formative/Interim |
| |
| Assessment--NAEP (NAEP Results and NAEP Organization) |
| |
| Assessment--Performance Based/Portfolio |
| |
| Assessment--Value Added |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention) |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention)--Alternative Education |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention)--Drugs/Alcohol |
| |
| Attendance |
| |
| Attendance--Compulsory |
| |
| Attendance--Statutory Ages (Upper and Lower) |
| |
| Attendance--Truancy |
| |
| Background Checks |
| |
| Bilingual/ESL |
| |
| Business Involvement |
| |
| Career/Technical Education |
| |
| Career/Technical Education--Career Academies/Apprenticeship |
| |
| Cheating |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Charter Districts |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Closings |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Cyber Charters |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Finance |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Research |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Choice/Open Enrollment |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Magnet or Specialized Schools |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Vouchers |
| |
| Civic Education |
| |
| Civic Education--Character Education |
| |
| Civic Education--Pledge of Allegiance |
| |
| Class Size |
| |
| Curriculum |
| |
| Curriculum--Arts Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Core Curriculum |
| |
| Curriculum--Drivers Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Environmental Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Family Living Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Financial Literacy/Economics Ed. |
| |
| Curriculum--Foreign Language/Sign Language |
| |
| Curriculum--Health/Nutrition Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Home Economics |
| |
| Curriculum--International Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Language Arts |
| |
| Curriculum--Language Arts--Writing/Spelling |
| |
| Curriculum--Mathematics |
| |
| Curriculum--Physical Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Science |
| |
| Curriculum--Sex Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Social Studies/History |
| |
| Demographics--Condition of Children/Adults |
| |
| Desegregation |
| |
| Economic/Workforce Development |
| |
| Education Research |
| |
| Equity |
| |
| Federal |
| |
| Finance |
| |
| Finance--Adequacy/Core Cost |
| |
| Finance--Bonds |
| |
| Finance--District |
| |
| Finance--Equity |
| |
| Finance--Facilities |
| |
| Finance--Federal |
| |
| Finance--Funding Formulas |
| |
| Finance--Litigation |
| |
| Finance--Local Foundations/Funds |
| |
| Finance--Lotteries |
| |
| Finance--Resource Efficiency |
| |
| Finance--State Budgets/Expenditures |
| |
| Finance--Student Fees |
| |
| Finance--Taxes/Revenues |
| |
| Finance--Taxes/Revenues--Alternative Revenues |
| |
| Governance |
| |
| Governance--Deregulation/Waivers/Home Rule |
| |
| Governance--Ethics/Conflict of Interest |
| |
| Governance--School Boards |
| |
| Governance--School Boards--Training |
| |
| Governance--Site-Based Management |
| |
| Governance--State Boards/Chiefs/Agencies |
| |
| Health |
| |
| Health--Child Abuse |
| |
| Health--Mental Health |
| |
| Health--Nutrition |
| |
| Health--School Based Clinics or School Nurses |
| |
| Health--Suicide Prevention |
| |
| Health--Teen Pregnancy |
| |
| High School |
| |
| High School--Advanced Placement |
| |
| High School--College Readiness |
| |
| High School--Dropout Rates/Graduation Rates |
| |
| High School--Dual/Concurrent Enrollment |
| |
| High School--Early Colleges/Middle Colleges |
| |
| High School--Exit Exams |
| |
| High School--GED (General Education Development) |
| |
| High School--Graduation Requirements |
| |
| High School--International Baccalaureate |
| |
| Instructional Approaches |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Grading Practices |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Homeschooling |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Problem Based Learning |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Single-Sex Education |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Time/Time on Task |
| |
| Integrated Services/Full-Service Schools |
| |
| International Benchmarking |
| |
| Leadership |
| |
| Leadership--District Superintendent |
| |
| Leadership--District Superintendent--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Certification and Licensure |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Evaluation and Effectiveness |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Preparation |
| |
| Middle School |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues--American Indian / Alaska Native / Native Hawaiian |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues--Hispanic |
| |
| No Child Left Behind |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Adequate Yearly Progress |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Assessment |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Choice/Transfer |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Consequences for Schools |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Finance |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Report Cards |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--School Support |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Supplemental Services |
| |
| Online Learning--Digital/Blended Learning |
| |
| Online Learning--Virtual Schools/Courses |
| |
| P-16 or P-20 |
| |
| P-3 |
| |
| P-3 Child Care |
| |
| P-3 Content Standards and Assessment |
| |
| P-3 Early Intervention (0-3) |
| |
| P-3 Ensuring Quality |
| |
| P-3 Evaluation/Economic Benefits |
| |
| P-3 Finance |
| |
| P-3 Governance |
| |
| P-3 Grades 1-3 |
| |
| P-3 Kindergarten--Full Day Kindergarten |
| |
| P-3 Preschool |
| |
| P-3 Teaching Quality/Professional Development |
| |
| Parent/Family |
| |
| Parent/Family--Parent Rights |
| |
| Partnerships--University/School |
| |
| Postsecondary |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability--Accreditation |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability--Diploma Mills |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Financial Aid |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Textbooks |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees--Prepd/College Savings Plans |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Compensation |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Intellectual Property |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Teaching Assistants |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance--Efficiency/Performance-Based Funding |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance--Facilities |
| |
| Postsecondary Governance and Structures |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--Community/Technical Colleges |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--For-Profit/Proprietary |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--Private/Independent |
| |
| Postsecondary Online Instruction |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Access |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Admissions Requirements |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Affirmative Action |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Outreach |
| |
| Postsecondary Students |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Foster Youth |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Graduate/Professional |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Military |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Minority |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Completion |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Completion--Completion Rates (Statistics) |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Developmental/Remediation |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Retention/Persistence |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Transfer/Articulation |
| |
| Private Schools |
| |
| Privatization |
| |
| Promising Practices |
| |
| Promotion/Retention |
| |
| Public Involvement |
| |
| Reading/Literacy |
| |
| Reading/Literacy--Adult Literacy |
| |
| Religion |
| |
| Religion--Prayer/Meditation |
| |
| Rural |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Day/Class Length |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Extended Day Programs |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Summer School |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Week |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Year |
| |
| School Safety |
| |
| School Safety--Bullying Prevention/Conflict Resolution |
| |
| School Safety--Code of Conduct |
| |
| School Safety--Corporal Punishment |
| |
| School Safety--Disaster/Emergency Preparedness |
| |
| School Safety--Expulsion/Suspension |
| |
| School Safety--No Child Left Behind--Safe Schools |
| |
| School Safety--Sexual Harassment and Assault |
| |
| School Safety--Special Education |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--District Consolidation/Deconsolidation |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Facilities |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Food Service |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Libraries |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Personnel (Non-Teaching) |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--School Size |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Shared Services |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Transportation |
| |
| Service-Learning |
| |
| Special Education |
| |
| Special Education--Finance |
| |
| Special Education--Placement |
| |
| Special Education--Transition |
| |
| Special Populations--Corrections Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Foster Care |
| |
| Special Populations--Gifted and Talented |
| |
| Special Populations--Homeless Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Immigrant Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Military |
| |
| Standards |
| |
| State Longitudinal Data Systems |
| |
| State Policymaking |
| |
| State Policymaking--Task Forces/Commissions |
| |
| STEM |
| |
| Student Achievement |
| |
| Student Achievement--Closing the Achievement Gap |
| |
| Student Supports--Counseling/Guidance |
| |
| Student Supports--Mentoring/Tutoring |
| |
| Student Supports--Remediation |
| |
| Students |
| |
| Students--Athletics/Extracurricular Activities |
| |
| Students--Employment |
| |
| Students--Mobility |
| |
| Students--Records/Rights |
| |
| Teaching Quality |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Alternative |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Assignment |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Highly Qualified Teachers |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Natl. Bd. for Prof. Teach. Stds. |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Special Education |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--State Prof. Standards Bds. |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Substitute Teachers |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay--Pay-for-Performance |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay--Retirement/Benefits |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Evaluation and Effectiveness |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Induction Programs and Mentoring |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Paraprofessionals |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Preparation |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Professional Development |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention--At-Risk Schools |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention--High-Needs Subjects |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Reduction in Force |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Teacher Attitudes |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Teacher Rights |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Tenure or Continuing Contract |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Unions/Collective Bargaining |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Working Conditions |
| |
| Technology |
| |
| Technology--Computer Skills |
| |
| Technology--Devices/Software/Hardware |
| |
| Technology--Equitable Access |
| |
| Technology--Funding Issues |
| |
| Technology--Teacher/Faculty Training |
| |
| Textbooks and Open Source |
| |
| Urban |
| |
| Urban--Governance |
| |