 |
State |
Status/Date |
Level |
Summary |
|
 | 21st Century Skills |
| |
| Accountability |
| |
| Accountability--Accreditation |
| |
| Accountability--Measures/Indicators |
| |
| Accountability--Reporting Results |
| |
| Accountability--Rewards |
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions |
| |
| Accountability--Sanctions/Interventions--Takeovers |
| |
| Accountability--School Improvement |
| |
| Adult Basic Education |
| |
| Assessment |
| |
| Assessment--Accommodations |
| |
| Assessment--College Entrance Exams |
| |
| Assessment--Computer Based |
| |
| Assessment--Formative/Interim |
| |
| Assessment--Value Added |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention) |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention)--Alternative Education |
| |
| At-Risk (incl. Dropout Prevention)--Drugs/Alcohol |
| |
| Attendance |
| |
| Attendance--Compulsory |
| |
| Attendance--Statutory Ages (Upper and Lower) |
| |
| Attendance--Truancy |
| |
| Background Checks |
| |
| Bilingual/ESL |
| |
| Business Involvement |
| |
| Career/Technical Education |
| |
| Career/Technical Education--Career Academies/Apprenticeship |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Charter Districts |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Closings |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Cyber Charters |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Charter Schools--Finance |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Choice/Open Enrollment |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Choice/Open Enrollment--Research |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Magnet or Specialized Schools |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Tax Credits |
| |
| Choice of Schools--Vouchers |
| |
| Civic Education |
| |
| Civic Education--Character Education |
| |
| Civic Education--Civic Knowledge and Literacy |
| |
| Civic Education--Pledge of Allegiance |
| |
| Class Size |
| |
| Curriculum |
| |
| Curriculum--Alignment |
| |
| Curriculum--Arts Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Censorship |
| |
| Curriculum--Drivers Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Excusal |
| |
| Curriculum--Family Living Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Financial Literacy/Economics Ed. |
| |
| Curriculum--Foreign Language/Sign Language |
| |
| Curriculum--Geography Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Health/Nutrition Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Language Arts |
| |
| Curriculum--Language Arts--Writing/Spelling |
| |
| Curriculum--Mathematics |
| |
| Curriculum--Physical Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Science |
| |
| Curriculum--Sex Education |
| |
| Curriculum--Social Studies/History |
| |
| Demographics--Enrollments |
| |
| Economic/Workforce Development |
| |
| Equity |
| |
| Federal |
| |
| Finance |
| |
| Finance--Bonds |
| |
| Finance--District |
| |
| Finance--Facilities |
| |
| Finance--Federal |
| |
| Finance--Funding Formulas |
| |
| Finance--Local Foundations/Funds |
| |
| Finance--Lotteries |
| |
| Finance--Private Giving |
| |
| Finance--Resource Efficiency |
| |
| Finance--State Budgets/Expenditures |
| |
| Finance--Student Fees |
| |
| Finance--Taxes/Revenues |
| |
| Finance--Taxes/Revenues--Alternative Revenues |
| |
| Governance |
| |
| Governance--Deregulation/Waivers/Home Rule |
| |
| Governance--Ethics/Conflict of Interest |
| |
| Governance--Mandates |
| |
| Governance--School Boards |
| |
| Governance--School Boards--Training |
| |
| Governance--Site-Based Management |
| |
| Governance--State Boards/Chiefs/Agencies |
| |
| Health |
| |
| Health--Child Abuse |
| |
| Health--Mental Health |
| |
| Health--Nutrition |
| |
| Health--School Based Clinics or School Nurses |
| |
| Health--Suicide Prevention |
| |
| High School |
| |
| High School--Advanced Placement |
| |
| High School--College Readiness |
| |
| High School--Dropout Rates/Graduation Rates |
| |
| High School--Dual/Concurrent Enrollment |
| |
| High School--Early Colleges/Middle Colleges |
| |
| High School--Exit Exams |
| |
| High School--GED (General Education Development) |
| |
| High School--Graduation Requirements |
| |
| High School--International Baccalaureate |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Grading Practices |
| |
| Instructional Approaches--Homeschooling |
| |
| Integrated Services/Full-Service Schools |
| |
| International Benchmarking |
| |
| Leadership |
| |
| Leadership--District Superintendent |
| |
| Leadership--District Superintendent--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Certification and Licensure |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Evaluation and Effectiveness |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Induction Programs and Mentoring |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Preparation |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Preparation--Alternative |
| |
| Leadership--Principal/School Leadership--Tenure |
| |
| Middle School |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues--American Indian / Alaska Native / Native Hawaiian |
| |
| Minority/Diversity Issues--Hispanic |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Adequate Yearly Progress |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Assessment |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Consequences for Schools |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Finance |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Reauthorization Issues/Waivers |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Report Cards |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--School Support |
| |
| No Child Left Behind--Special Populations |
| |
| Online Learning--Digital/Blended Learning |
| |
| Online Learning--Virtual Schools/Courses |
| |
| P-16 or P-20 |
| |
| P-3 |
| |
| P-3 Child Care |
| |
| P-3 Content Standards and Assessment |
| |
| P-3 Early Intervention (0-3) |
| |
| P-3 Ensuring Quality |
| |
| P-3 Evaluation/Economic Benefits |
| |
| P-3 Family Involvement |
| |
| P-3 Finance |
| |
| P-3 Governance |
| |
| P-3 Grades 1-3 |
| |
| P-3 Kindergarten |
| |
| P-3 Preschool |
| |
| P-3 Teaching Quality/Professional Development |
| |
| Parent/Family |
| |
| Parent/Family--Parent Rights |
| |
| Partnerships--University/School |
| |
| Postsecondary |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability--Accreditation |
| |
| Postsecondary Accountability--Diploma Mills |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Financial Aid |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Textbooks |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees--Prepd/College Savings Plans |
| |
| Postsecondary Affordability--Tuition/Fees--Undocumented Immigrants |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Compensation |
| |
| Postsecondary Faculty--Tenure |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance--Efficiency/Performance-Based Funding |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance--Facilities |
| |
| Postsecondary Finance--Revenue and Expenditures |
| |
| Postsecondary Governance and Structures |
| |
| Postsecondary Governance and Structures--Administrative/Leadership Issues |
| |
| Postsecondary Governance and Structures--State Executives/State Agencies |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--Community/Technical Colleges |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--For-Profit/Proprietary |
| |
| Postsecondary Institutions--Private/Independent |
| |
| Postsecondary Online Instruction |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Access |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Admissions Requirements |
| |
| Postsecondary Participation--Affirmative Action |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Adults |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Disabled |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Foster Youth |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Graduate/Professional |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--International |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Military |
| |
| Postsecondary Students--Minority |
| |
| Postsecondary Success |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Completion |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Completion--Completion Rates (Statistics) |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Developmental/Remediation |
| |
| Postsecondary Success--Transfer/Articulation |
| |
| Private Schools |
| |
| Privatization |
| |
| Promotion/Retention |
| |
| Public Involvement |
| |
| Reading/Literacy |
| |
| Religion |
| |
| Rural |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Day/Class Length |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Extended Day Programs |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Summer School |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Week |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Year |
| |
| Scheduling/School Calendar--Year Round |
| |
| School Climate/Culture |
| |
| School Safety |
| |
| School Safety--Bullying Prevention/Conflict Resolution |
| |
| School Safety--Code of Conduct |
| |
| School Safety--Corporal Punishment |
| |
| School Safety--Disaster/Emergency Preparedness |
| |
| School Safety--Expulsion/Suspension |
| |
| School Safety--Sexual Harassment and Assault |
| |
| School Safety--Special Education |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--District Consolidation/Deconsolidation |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Facilities |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Food Service |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Libraries |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Personnel (Non-Teaching) |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--School Size |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Shared Services |
| |
| School/District Structure/Operations--Transportation |
| |
| Service-Learning |
| |
| Special Education |
| |
| Special Education--Federal Law/Regulations |
| |
| Special Education--Finance |
| |
| Special Education--Placement |
| |
| Special Education--Transition |
| |
| Special Populations--Corrections Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Foster Care |
| |
| Special Populations--Gifted and Talented |
| |
| Special Populations--Homeless Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Migrant Education |
| |
| Special Populations--Military |
| |
| Standards |
| |
| Standards--Common Core State Standards |
| |
 | State Longitudinal Data Systems |
| |
| CA | Signed into law 09/2010 | P-12 | To the extent consistent with federal and state privacy laws, authorizes local educational agency (LEA) grantees funded through to the After School Education and Safety Program and grants for 21st Century Community Learning Centers programs to submit the following information to afterschool program operators with which the LEA has a contract:
(a) School attendance data
(b) Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program test scores, and scores on individual California Standards Tests
(c) High school exit exam scores
(d) English language development test placement or reclassification scores
(e) California Healthy Kids Survey results in aggregate form.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2151-2200/ab_2178_bill_20100929_chaptered.pdf
Title: A.B. 2178
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 09/2010 | P-12 | From bill summary: Requires the department of education, contingent on federal funding for this purpose and in consultation with the department of finance and the legislative analyst's office, to prepare the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) to include data on a quarterly rate of pupil attendance. Requires that CALPADS be capable of issuing to local educational agencies periodic reports on district, school, class and individual pupil rates of absence and chronic absentees. States legislative intent to support the development of early warning systems to identify and support individual pupils who are at risk of academic failure or of dropping out of school.
Existing law requires the superintendent of public instruction annually to submit to the governor, the legislature, and the state board of education a report on dropouts using the data produced by CALPADS.
New provision requires the report to include chronic absentee rates when that data is available. Makes implementation of the provisions regarding the inclusion of pupil attendance data in CALPADS contingent upon the appropriation of federal funds specifically for such purposes. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1351-1400/sb_1357_bill_20100930_chaptered.pdf
Title: S.B. 1357
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 09/2010 | Postsec. | From bill analysis: Existing law creates the California Education Information System, consisting of the CALPADS (California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System) and the CALTIDES (California Longitudinal Teacher Integrated Data Education System). Adds an expression of legislative intent that, as the California Education Information System is implemented over time, access to public information already available on various measures of the quality of teacher preparation programs be available in electronic format and be accessible to the extent practicable through downloadable pages and reports accessible to the public in a consolidated manner. Requires all teacher preparation programs, including but not limited to local educational agencies or other programs not accredited by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, to provide information to prospective candidates on the licensure exam pass rates of its program completers for the most recent available year, if that data is available electronically through the Commission on Teacher Credentialing Web site. Provides the link may also include access to additional data from the commission and from the CALTIDES regarding the types of programs offered and data on program effectiveness.
Redefines "qualifying institution" for purposes of the Cal Grant Program to mean any institution that is (1) either a California private or independent postsecondary educational institution that participates in specified
federal student aid programs, a nonprofit institution that is headquartered and operating in California that meets specified criteria, or a California public postsecondary educational institution AND (2) that complies with a requirement to provide information on where to access California licensure exam pass rates for graduates of undergraduate programs leading to employment for which passage of a California licensing exam is required, if that data is electronically available through the Web site of a California licensing or regulatory agency. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2051-2100/ab_2086_bill_20100924_chaptered.pdf
Title: A.B. 2086
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| MI | Signed into law 09/2010 | Postsec.
Community College | Requires community colleges receiving funds under this appropriations bill to cooperate with the state to comply with the provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law 111-5, requiring the establishment of a statewide P-20 longitudinal data system. http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/publicact/htm/2010-PA-0165.htm
Title: S.B. 1151 - Sec. 405
Source: http://www.legislature.mi.gov
| |
| IL | Signed into law 07/2010 | Postsec. | Amends the P-20 Longitudinal Education Data System Act. Provides that beginning July 2012, the board of higher education is authorized to collect and maintain data from any non-public institution of higher learning that confers graduate and professional degrees. Directs the board of higher education to seek grant funding for a consortium that includes non-public institutions of higher learning, so as to provide assistance in the development of a data collection system. Provides that data submitted to the board of higher education by a consortium of non-public colleges and universities is prohibited from being included in any interstate data-sharing agreements with other states unless consortium participants agree to allow interstate data sharing. Permits any non-public college to prohibit its data from being shared with any other state, and/or from being included in any interstate data-sharing agreement. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/96/PDF/096-1249.pdf
Title: H.B. 6092
Source: www.ilga.gov
| |
| NC | Signed into law 07/2010 | P-12 | Requires school improvement teams to use the Education Value Added Assessment System (EVAAS) or a compatible and comparable system approved by the State Board of Education, to analyze student data to identify root causes for problems and to determine actions to address them. http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2009/Bills/House/PDF/H1669v2.pdf
Title: H.B. 1669
Source: http://www.ncga.state.nc.us
| |
| NH | Signed into law 06/2010 | P-12
Postsec. | Requires early childhood programs and postsecondary institutions to submit a report to the department of education containing information on pupil indicators
in the following areas:
(a) Attendance rates.
(b) Annual and cumulative drop-out rates of high school pupils and annual drop-out rates for pupils in grades 7 and 8.
(c) School environment indicators, such as safe-schools data.
(d) Number and percentage of graduating pupils going on to post-secondary education, military service, and advanced placement participation.
(e) Performance on state tests administered pursuant to RSA 193-C and other standardized tests administered at local option.
(f) Expulsion and suspension rates, including in-school and out-of-school suspensions, which shall be reported for each school year.
(g) Number and percentage of classes taught by highly qualified teachers.
(h) Teacher and administrative turnover rates at the school and district levels.
Requires the department of education to collect and integrate such information into the data warehouse. Requires early childhood programs and postsecondary institutions to participate in the unique pupil identification system.
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/SB0503.html
Title: S.B. 503
Source: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us
| |
| AZ | Signed into law 05/2010 | P-12 | Requires the superintendent of public instruction to enter into contracts with public or private entities to evaluate the existing system of data collection, compilation and reported conducted by the state department of education on or before August 1, 2010 and award a contract no later than October 1, 2010. Stipulates that the contracts from the state department of education be awarded subject to the appropriation of state funds or the receipt of federal funds, private donations, or grants from any lawful public or private source for this purpose. Stipulates that the request for proposals must require the evaluation of the student accountability information system and the data warehouse and indicates what data must be included. Requires the superintendent to provide copies of the written report to the governor, the speaker of the state house of representatives, the president of the senate and the joint legislative budget council within 30 days of receiving the report. Requires the state department of education to issue an additional request for proposal to replace or update the student accountability information system and indicates what the contractor is to perform. Specifies what must be included in the information system and what must be included before the state superintendent awards a contract. Establishes the Data Governance Commission and describes its membership. Requires the commission to identify, examine and evaluate the needs of public institutions who provide instruction to pupils in preschool, K-12 and postsecondary programs in Arizona and to perform the following: (1) Establish guidelines related to managed data access, technology, privacy and security, adequacy of training, adequacy of data model implementation, prioritization of funding opportunities and resolution of data conflicts; (2) provide recommendations on technology spending; (3) provide analysis and recommendations on the control of data confidentiality and data security, access privileges and management, data audit management, data standards for storage and data transmission, documentation standards, data archival and retrieval management systems, publication of reports, timelines and progress; (4) submit an annual report to the governor, the speaker of the house, president of the senate and provide copies of the report to the secretary of state. Establishes a Task Force on Data Systems and charges the task force with designing a request for proposals form to be used by the department of education. Chapter 334
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/hb2733s.pdf
Title: H.B. 2733
Source: http://www.azleg.gov/
| |
| CO | Signed into law 05/2010 | P-12
Postsec. | Relates to a data reporting request based on individual student identifiers, including dropouts, and those enrolled in literacy programs and college basic skills courses.
http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/clics2010a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/42E285F47258D0C6872576AC0055EA3A?open&file=1171_enr.pdf
Title: H.B. 1171
Source: http://www.leg.state.co.us
| |
| CT | Signed into law 05/2010 | P-12 | Directs the state department of education to, on or before July 1, 2013, expand the state-wide public school information system as follows:
(1) Track and report data relating to student, teacher and school and district performance growth and make such information available to local and regional boards of education for use in evaluating educational performance and growth of teachers and students enrolled in public schools in the state; (2) Collect data relating to student enrollment in and graduation from institutions of higher education for any student who had been assigned a unique student identifier, provided such data is available; (3) Develop means for access to and data sharing with the data systems of public institutions of higher education in the state. http://www.cga.ct.gov/2010/ACT/PA/2010PA-00111-R00SB-00438-PA.htm
Title: S.B. 438 - Sec. 3
Source: http://www.cga.ct.gov
| |
| CT | Signed into law 05/2010 | P-12 | Establishes the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council within the state department of education; details the council's membership and provides that the council is responsible for (1) assisting board of education in the development and implementation of the teacher evaluation guidelines and (2) data collection and evaluation support system (see Sec. 5 of the bill). http://www.cga.ct.gov/2010/ACT/PA/2010PA-00111-R00SB-00438-PA.htm
Title: S.B. 438 - Sec. 5
Source: http://www.cga.ct.gov
| |
| NY | Signed into law 05/2010 | P-12 | Makes an appropriation of $20,400,000 to the state education department for services and expenses related to implementing a state longitudinal data system.
http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=&bn=A11309&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y
Title: A.B. 11309
Source: assembly.state.ny.us
| |
| HI | Signed into law 04/2010 | P-12
Postsec. | Requires the department of education, the University of Hawaii, and the department of labor and industrial relations, and other state agencies to share data to support research that will improve educational and workforce outcomes and meet the longitudinal data requirements of the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Directs the aforementioned agencies to jointly determine the data to be shared, and to share data at least annually, in a manner that protects the confidentiality of student information. Directs the aforementioned agencies to establish a data governance and access committee that meets on a quarterly basis to determine protocols to prioritize analyses and research questions that will provide information to (1) improve educational and workforce outcomes and policies, and (2) approve requests for access to data provided by the department of education, the University of Hawaii, the department of labor and industrial, and other state agencies, as appropriate. Directs all state agency directors to consider sharing data for the statewide longitudinal data system. http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2010/Bills/SB2122_SD1_.HTM
Title: S.B. 2122
Source: www.capitol.hawaii.gov
| |
| MD | Signed into law 04/2010 | P-12
Postsec. | Establishes the Maryland Longitudinal Data System (MLDS) as a statewide data system that contains individual-level student data and workforce data from all levels of education and the state's workforce. The bill also establishes a Maryland Longitudinal Data System Center within state government to serve as a central repository for the data, to ensure compliance with federal privacy laws, to perform research on the data sets, and to fulfill education reporting requirements and approved public information requests. The governing board of the center must submit an annual report by December 15 to the Governor and the General Assembly. The bill takes effect July 1, 2010. The requirement that state agencies, local education agencies (LEAs), and educational institutions submit data to the center in accordance with specified plans, terminates June 30, 2011. http://mlis.state.md.us/2010rs/bills/sb/sb0275e.pdf
Title: S.B. 275
Source: http://mlis.state.md.us
| |
| NE | Signed into law 04/2010 | P-12
Postsec. | Provides for the calculation of state aid for unified systems and makes changes related to the early childhood education programs to be included in the calculation of state aid, as well as district responsibilities for students participating in open enrollment. Also changes the graduate program requirements for the Enhancing Excellence in Teaching Program to include graduate studies other than teacher education programs. Among other provisions, removes a redundant reporting requirement for county assessors to certify taxable value of school districts; clarifies residency provisions for school districts; modifies qualifications for preschool programs that receive state aid funds; and harmonizes the calculation of unused budget authority with recent changes in the budget authority provisions for school districts. Defines the educational service unit coordinating council as a political subdivision, but does not grant taxing authority. Also requires the board to adopt a policy for sharing student data with the University of Nebraska Regents, the Nebraska State Colleges board of trustees and the board of governors from each community college area.
http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Slip/LB1071.pdf
Title: L.B. 1071
Source: http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov
| |
| OK | Signed into law 04/2010 | P-12 | Requires any school district that is not in compliance with the standards and requirements established by the State Board of Education related to the state student record system as provided in Section 3-160 to forfeit its state aid for the time of noncompliance.
http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2009-10bills/SB/SB2211_ENR.RTF
Title: S.B. 2211
Source: http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us
| |
| CO | Issued 03/2010 | P-12 | The Commission is to ensure and advance a comprehensive service delivery system for children from birth to age eight using data to improve decision-making, alignment, and coordination among federally-funded and state-funded services and programs. The Early Childhood Colorado Framework will be the Commission's guide for developing this service delivery system across child health, child mental health, early learning, and family support and parent education. The initial charge of the Commission will be to focus on the development of an interagency data system, established by H.B. 09-1285, which expanded data tracking and usage across the multiple agencies and programs. This data system will provide the infrastructure to monitor progress towards meeting the outcomes identified in the Framework.
http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadername2=MDT-Type&blobheadervalue1=inline%3B+filename%3D636%2F716%2FB+2010-002+%28Early+Childhood+Leadership+Commission%29+Search.pdf&blobheadervalue2=abinary%3B+charset%3DUTF-8&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1251607769244&ssbinary=true
Title: Exec. Order B 2010-002
Source: http://www.colorado.gov
| |
| NM | Signed into law 03/2010 | P-12
Postsec.
Community College | Provides for an educational data system that serves pre-kindergarten through post-graduate education. Officials will establish a data system to: (1) collect, integrate and report longitudinal student-level and educator data required to implement federally or state-required education performance accountability measures; (2) conduct research and evaluation
regarding federal, state and local education and training programs at all levels; and (3) audit and ensure compliance of those programs with applicable federal or state requirements. The data system shall include the use of a common student identifier for the prekindergarten through post-graduate system and an educator identifier, with the ability to match data about students, educators, post-secondary education programs and other educational agencies.
http://nmlegis.gov/Sessions/10%20Regular/final/HB0070.pdf
Title: H.B. 70
Source: http://nmlegis.gov/
| |
| TN | Signed into law 03/2010 | Postsec. | Prevents the Tennessee Independent Colleges and Universities Association and its member institutions from being held liable for breach of confidentiality of student data or records that are required to be submitted to THEC, if the breach was a result of the actions of the commission or its staff.
http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/106/Bill/SB2793.pdf
Title: S.B. 2793
Source: http://www.capitol.tn.gov/
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Authorizes the department of education, the University of California, the California State University, the chancellor of the California Community Colleges, the commission on teacher credentialing, the employment development department, and the California School Information Services to enter into agreements in order to facilitate the implementation of a longitudinal education data system. Page 6 of 32: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_1_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf
Specifies that these provisions become operative only if Senate Bill 4 of the Fifth Extraordinary Session of 2009-10 is also enacted (full text http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_4_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf). S.B. 4E was also enacted January 7, 2010.
Title: S.B. 1E - Section 4
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Sections below refer to sections of bill. Text below largely from Legislative Counsel's Digest:
Section 1: Amends Section 1798.24 of the Civil Code, relating to the release of personal information. Requires the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS) to enter into a written agreement with the institutional review board to provide the required data security approvals for the release of data to researchers.
Section 2: Existing law directs the department to establish a process for but does not require districts to issue unique pupil identifiers to students in preschool programs. New provision *requires* center-based child care and development programs to maintain unique pupil identifiers. By January 2011, requires the department to establish a process for districts to issue, maintain, and report information using the unique statewide pupil identifiers for students in state- and federally-funded center-based child care and development programs under the department's purview. Establishes legislative intent that by January 2011, the department ensure that the preschool data elements described in the America COMPETES Act be collected for all district-operated preschool programs. Specifies that, except to the extent required by federal law, center-based child care and development programs are not required to implement unique pupil identifiers until an appropriation is provided.
Sections 4 and 5: Beginning July 2010, authorizes the department, to the extent permissible under the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and state law, to conduct pupil data management on behalf of local educational agencies (LEAs). States legislative intent to accomplish specified objectives, including complying with all applicable federal laws, including FERPA, the California Constitution, and all applicable state laws, in order to protect pupil rights and privacy. Authorizes LEAs to access specified data via the state data system, and, to the extent permissible under federal and state law, to share specified data via the state data system. Requires the department to establish an education data team to act as an institutional review board to review and respond to all requests for pupil data. Requires the department, to the extent feasible, to redirect department personnel for the purposes of the education data team rather than establishing new positions. Makes the department responsible for data management decisions for data under its jurisdiction and makes the department and an LEA jointly liable for any data management decisions in which the department and the LEA participate jointly. Requires the department to develop appropriate
policies and procedures for the education data team by July 2010. Authorizes the department to assess a fee on research applicants to cover prescribed costs. Requires the department to perform the duties specified in these provisions with its existing resources. Makes these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2013, and repeals them on January 1, 2014.
Section 6: Establishes legislative intent to create a P-20 statewide longitudinal data system to inform education policy and improve instruction. Establishes intent to require the department of education, commission on teacher credentialing, California Commmunity Colleges, University of California and California State University and any other state agency to require the disclosure of personally identifiable pupil records to this P-20 system, as permissible under state and federal law. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_2_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf
Title: S.B. 2E
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Adds Section 10601.6 to the education code. Permits districts to use data in the California Education Information System and/or any other data system to evaluate teachers and administrators and to make employment decisions, but only if these decisions comply with Chapter 10.7 (commencing with Section 3540) of Division 4 of Title 1 of the Government Code. Pages 5-6 of 32: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_1_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf
Specifies that these provisions become operative only if Senate Bill 4 of the Fifth Extraordinary Session of 2009-10 is also enacted (full text http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_4_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf). S.B. 4E was also enacted January 7, 2010.
Title: S.B. 1E - Section 2
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Directs the department of education to charge reasonable fees to researchers applying for access to individually identifiable data, in order to cover costs of responding to time-intensive requests. Requires fees to equal the costs incurred by the department in responding to the applicant's request. Bars fees from being charged to any state agency, except when related to the release of data for research purposes to the University of California, the California State University, or the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges. Page 7 of 32: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_1_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf
Specifies that these provisions become operative only if Senate Bill 4 of the Fifth Extraordinary Session of 2009-10 is also enacted (full text http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_4_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf). S.B. 4E was also enacted January 7, 2010.
Title: S.B. 1E - Section 6
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Directs the department of education, by January 2011, to ensure that the data elements pertaining to success in the 21st century workforce described in the federal America COMPETES Act be collected for career technical education programs operated by a local educational agency. Page 6 of 32: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_1_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf
Specifies that these provisions become operative only if Senate Bill 4 of the Fifth Extraordinary Session of 2009-10 is also enacted (full text http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_4_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf). S.B. 4E was also enacted January 7, 2010.
Title: S.B. 1E - Section 3
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Adds that further purposes of state longitudinal data system are (1) to allow the state to publicly report data, as specified by the federal America COMPETES Act and as required by the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and (2) to ensure that any data access provided to researchers, as required by the federal Race to the Top regulations and guidelines is provided, only to the extent that the data access is in compliance with the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974.
Existing law requires the department of education to submit an expenditure plan to the department of finance detailing any administrative costs to the department and costs to any local educational agency, if
applicable, of retaining data elements required for compliance with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. New provision requires the appropriate postsecondary agencies also to submit such an expenditure plan. Adds provision that, to enable the department and two- and four-year public institutions in the state to meet federal ARRA requirements, these entities must be authorized to obtain quarterly wage data, effective July 2010, on students who have attended their respective systems, to assess the impact of education on the employment and earnings of those students, to conduct the annual analysis of district-level and individual district or postsecondary education system performance in achieving priority educational outcomes, and to submit the required reports to the legislature and the governor. Pages 24-27 of 32: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_1_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf
Specifies that these provisions become operative only if Senate Bill 4 of the Fifth Extraordinary Session of 2009-10 is also enacted (full text http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_4_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf). S.B. 4E was also enacted January 7, 2010.
Title: S.B. 1E - Section 21
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12
Postsec. | Permits unemployment and disability compensation information to be used to allow the state department of education and the 2- and 4-year public postsecondary systems, pursuant to the requirements prescribed
by the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, to obtain quarterly wage data on students to assess the impact of education on the employment and earnings of those students, to conduct the annual analysis of district-level and individual district or postsecondary education system performance in achieving priority educational outcomes, and to submit the required reports to the legislature and the governor. Requires that the information be provided to the extent permitted by federal statutes and regulations.
Page 31 of 32: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_1_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf
Specifies that these provisions become operative only if Senate Bill 4 of the Fifth Extraordinary Session of 2009-10 is also enacted (full text http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx5_4_bill_20100107_chaptered.pdf). S.B. 4E was also enacted January 7, 2010.
Title: S.B. 1E - Section 22
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| IL | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Amends 105 ILCS 5/2-3.25g. After effective date, bars districts, joint agreements of districts or regional superintendents from seeking a waiver or modification of a mandate requiring (i) student performance
data to be a significant factor in teacher or principal evaluations or (ii) teachers and principals to be rated using the categories of "excellent", "proficient", "needs improvement" or "unsatisfactory". Requires any previously authorized waiver or modification from such requirements to terminate.
Creates new 105 ILCS 5/24A-2.5. Defines "evaluator" to include an adminstrator or other qualified individuals. Allows Chicago district to require department chairs to evaluate teachers in their department(s), provided the district bargains with its teacher bargaining representative over the impact of such a requirement on department chairs. Defines "implementation date" : (1) for Chicago, as at least 300 schools by September 2012 and the remaining schools by September 2013; (2) for other districts receiving a Race to the Top grant or School Improvement [under ESEA/NCLB] grant, as the date specified in those grants for implementing a teacher and principal evaluation system incorporating student growth; (3) for the lowest performing 20% of districts outside Chicago (to be determined by state superintendent), September 2015; (4) for all other districts outside Chicago, September 2016.
Amends 105 ILCS 5/24A-3. Requires evaluators to participate in inservice training on evaluating certified personnel before performing any evaluation, and at least once during each certificate renewal cycle. Requires any evaluator performing an evaluation after September 1, 2012 to first complete a state board-approved prequalification program. Requires that the program include rigorous training and an independent observer's determination that the evaluator's ratings properly align to state board-established requirements.
Amends 105 ILCS 5/24A-4. Directs every district, by its applicable implementation date, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or teachers' exclusive bargaining representatives, to incorporate student growth data/indicators as a significant factor in teacher performance ratings and its evaluation plan for all teachers. Specifies criteria that each district's evaluation plan must meet, including among others the criteria other than student growth that will be used in evaluating the teacher, and the weight that each will have. Describes a joint committee, composed equally of district- and teacher- (or collective bargaining unit-) selected representation, that each district must use to incorporate the use of student growth data in rating teacher performance into the evaluation plan. Provides that if a joint committee does not reach agreement on the plan within 180 days of the committee's first meeting, the district must implement the model evaluation plan set forth in Section 24A-7; provides that if Chicago's joint committee does not reach agreement on the plan within 90 days of the committee's first meeting, the district will not be required to implement any aspect of the model evaluation plan and may implement its last best proposal.
Amends 24A-5. By September 2012, requires each district to establish a teacher evaluation plan that ensures evaluations at least once every school year for each teacher not in contractual continued service, and at least every two school years for each teacher in contractual continued service [i.e., untenured and tenured teachers]. Requires that any teacher in contractual continued service who receives a "needs improvement" or "unsatisfactory" performance rating be evaluated at least once in the school year following the receipt of such rating. Specifies that nothing bars a principal from evaluating any teachers within a school during
his or her first year as principal of such school. Identifies performance ratings (terms) that must be applied to teachers in contractual continued service before and after September 2012. Within 30 days of completion of an evaluation rating a teacher in contractual continued service as "needs improvement", requires the evaluator, in consultation with the teacher, to develop a professional development plan, directed
to the areas that need improvement and any supports that the district will provide to address the areas needing improvement. Requires that a teacher in contractual continued service who receives an "unsatisfactory" evaluation rating participate in a remediation plan, including 90 days of in-classroom remediation, unless an applicable collective bargaining agreement provides for a shorter duration. Requires the evaluator to conduct a mid-point and final evaluation during and at the end of the remediation period. Specifies that nothing in statute prohibits the dismissal or non-renewal of teachers not in contractual continued service
for any reason not prohibited by applicable employment, labor and civil rights laws.
Amends 24A-7. Directs the state board to adopt rules:
(1) Relating to the methods for measuring student growth (including, but not limited to, limitations on the age of useable data; the amount of data needed to reliably and validly measure growth for the purpose of teacher and principal evaluations; and whether and at what time annual state assessments may be used as one of multiple measures of student growth)
(2) Defining the term "significant factor" for purposes of including consideration of student growth in performance ratings
(3) Controlling for such factors as student characteristics (including students receiving special education and English Language Learner services), student attendance, and student mobility to best measure the impact that a teacher, principal, school and district have on students' academic achievement
(4) Establishing minimum requirements for district teacher and principal evaluation instruments and procedures
(5) Establishing a model evaluation plan for use by districts, in which student growth must comprise 50% of the performance rating.
Specifies that the rules may not preclude the Chicago district from using an annual state assessment as the sole measure of student growth for purposes of teacher or principal evaluations. Requires that the rules be developed through collaboration with a Performance Evaluation Advisory Council, whose members must be selected by the state superintendent and include representatives of teacher unions and school district
management, persons with expertise in performance evaluation processes and systems, as well as other stakeholders. Requires that the council meet at least quarterly until June 30, 2017.
Creates new 105 ILCS 5/24A-7.1. Prohibits disclosure of public school teacher, principal and superintendent performance evaluations.
Amends 105 ILCS 5/24A-15. Provides that, effective September 2012, each district's principal evaluation plan must rate the principal's performance as "excellent", "proficient", "needs improvement" or "unsatisfactory", and must ensure every principal is evaluated at least once every school year. Repeals provision requiring that principal evaluations align with the Illinois Professional Standards for
School Leaders or research-based district standards; replaces with provision that principal evaluations align with research-based standards established by administrative rule. Effective September 2012, requires principal evaluations to provide for the use of data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance.
Adds new 105 ILCS 5/24A-20. Directs the state board, with the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council, to develop and implement the following data collection and evaluation assessment and support systems:
(1) A system to annually collect and publish data by district and school on teacher and administrator performance evaluation outcomes
(2) Both a teacher and principal model evaluation template that allow customization by districts that does not conflict with statutory requirements
(3) An evaluator pre-qualification program based on the model teacher evaluation template
(4) An evaluator training program based on the model teacher evaluation template
(5) A superintendent training program based on the model principal evaluation template
(6) One or more instruments to provide feedback to principals on the school's instructional environment
(7) A state board-provided or -approved technical assistance system that supports districts in the development and implementation of teacher and principal evaluation systems
(8) Web-based systems and tools supporting implementation of the model templates and the evaluator pre-qualification and training programs
(9) A process for measuring and reporting correlations between local principal and teacher evaluations and (A) student growth in tested grades and subjects and (B) teacher retention rates
(10) A process for assessing whether district evaluation systems developed pursuant to this Act and that consider student growth as a significant factor in teacher and principal performance ratings are valid and reliable, contribute to the development of staff, and improve student achievement outcomes. By September 2014, requires that a research-based study be issued (a) assessing such systems for validity and reliability, contribution to the development of staff, and improvement of student performance and (b) recommending, based on the results of this study, any changes that need to be incorporated into teacher and principal evaluation systems that consider student growth as a significant factor in the rating performance.
Specifies that these data collection and support systems must be developed by September 30, 2011 if Illinois receives a Race to the Top grant, and by September 30, 2012 if the state does not receive a Race to the Top grant. Adds that aforementioned items (3) and (4) (evaluator pre-qualification program and evaluator training program, both based on the model teacher evaluation template) must be developed by September 30, 2011, regardless of whether the state is awarded a Race to the Top grant. Also directs the state board (by September 2011 if the state does receive and by September 2012 if the state does not receive a Race to the Top grant) to execute or contract for the execution of the assessment in aforementioned item (10) above to determine whether local evaluation systems developed pursuant to this Act have been valid and reliable, contributed to the development of staff, and improved student performance.
Requires districts to submit data and information to the state board on teacher and principal performance evaluations and evaluation plans. Requires that such data include: (i) data on the performance rating given to all teachers in contractual continued service, (ii) data on district recommendations to renew or not renew teachers not in contractual continued service, and (iii) data on the performance rating given to all principals. Provides that if the state board does not timely fulfill any of the requirements set forth in Sections 24A-7 and 24A-20, and adequate and sustainable federal, state or other funds are not provided to the state board and districts to meet their responsibilities, the applicable implementation date must be postponed by the number of calendar days equal to those needed by the state board to fulfill such requirements and for the
adequate and sustainable funds to be provided to the state board and districts.
Amends 105 ILCS 5/34-8, regarding duties of the state superintendent. By September 2012, directs the superintendent or his/her designee to develop a written principal evaluation plan that addresses elements identified in 105 ILCS 5/24A-15.
Amends 105 ILCS 5/34-85c. Amends provisions that authorize districts and collective bargaining agents to establish alternative procedures for teacher evaluation, remediation and removal for cause after remediation. Provides that by September 2012, (i) any alternative procedures must include provisions whereby student performance data is a significant factor in teacher evaluation and (ii) teachers are rated as "excellent", "proficient", "needs improvement" or "unsatisfactory". http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/96/PDF/096-0861.pdf
Title: S.B. 315
Source: www.ilga.gov
| |
| MI | Signed into law 01/2010 | P-12 | Part of Michigan's Race to the Top Legislation. Requires the Center for Educational Performance and Information (located in the Office of the State Budget Director within the Department of Management and Budget) to create and implement a teacher identifier system with the ability to match an individual teacher and individual students that the teacher has taught. The system must do all of the following: (1) make accessible annual state assessment records of individual pupils; (2) enable individual pupil academic achievement data, including growth in academic achievement, to be correlated to each teacher who has taught the pupil; and (3) enable local board members, teachers and school administrators to have access to the data.
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2009-2010/publicact/htm/2009-PA-0203.htm
Title: S.B. 926 - Sec. 94a(1)(i)
Source: http://www.legislature.mi.gov
| |
| State Policymaking |
| |
| State Policymaking--Task Forces/Commissions |
| |
| STEM |
| |
| Student Achievement |
| |
| Student Achievement--Closing the Achievement Gap |
| |
| Student Supports |
| |
| Student Supports--Counseling/Guidance |
| |
| Student Supports--Remediation |
| |
| Student Surveys |
| |
| Students |
| |
| Students--Athletics/Extracurricular Activities |
| |
| Students--Employment |
| |
| Students--K-12 Exchange Students |
| |
| Students--Mobility |
| |
| Students--Records/Rights |
| |
| Teaching Quality |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Alternative |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Assignment |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Natl. Bd. for Prof. Teach. Stds. |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Special Education |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--State Prof. Standards Bds. |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Certification and Licensure--Substitute Teachers |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay--Pay-for-Performance |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Compensation and Diversified Pay--Retirement/Benefits |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Evaluation and Effectiveness |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Induction Programs and Mentoring |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Paraprofessionals |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Preparation |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Professional Development |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention--At-Risk Schools |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Recruitment and Retention--High-Needs Subjects |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Reduction in Force |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Teacher Rights |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Tenure or Continuing Contract |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Unions/Collective Bargaining |
| |
| Teaching Quality--Working Conditions |
| |
| Technology |
| |
| Technology--Devices/Software/Hardware |
| |
| Technology--Equitable Access |
| |
| Technology--Funding Issues |
| |
| Technology--Research/Evaluation |
| |
| Textbooks and Open Source |
| |
| Whole-School Reform Models |
| |