| State |
Status/Date |
Level |
Summary |
|
 FL | Signed into law 04/2012 | P-12 | Requires a school improvement plan to include strategies for improving student achievement if a school has a significant student achievement gap for one or more subgroups, has not significantly decreased the percentage of students scoring below satisfactory on statewide assessments, or has significantly lower graduation rates for a subgroup compared to the state's graduation rate. Revises provisions requiring a charter school to implement a school improvement plan to raise student achievement. Revises corrective actions to be selected and implemented by a low-performing charter school. Provides requirements for implementation of corrective actions and intervention and support strategies identified in a charter school's school improvement plan. Provides for termination of a charter school not making continuous improvement unless it meets specified criteria. Revises provisions relating to the state board's authority to enforce public school improvement, to require the state board to comply with the federal flexibility waiver approved by the U.S. secretary of education. Beginning with the 2011-12 school year, directs the department of education to annually identify each public school in need of intervention and support to improve student academic performance. Defines all schools earning a grade of "D" or "F" as schools in need of intervention and support. Directs the state board to adopt by rule a differentiated matrix of intervention and support strategies for assisting traditional public schools and rules for assisting a charter school that has earned a "D" or "F." Specifies that the state board must apply the most intense intervention and support strategies to schools earning an "F" grade. Deletes department duties relating to the categorization of low-performing schools. Provides state board, district, and school requirements for implementing strategies and turnaround options to improve school performance. Revises turnaround options available to a district, and requires state board approval of the option selected for implementation. Directs the state board to adopt rules relating to plans for implementing turnaround options. Requires districts, for the 2012-13 school year, to use 15% of their Title I funds to meet supplemental educational services requirements. Requires that supplemental educational services be provided in Title I schools to students performing at Level 1 or Level 2 on the FCAT. Requires each district to contract with department-approved supplemental educational service providers. Revises the contents of the annual report of statewide assessment program results. Requires school report cards to include the percent of students performing at or above grade level and making a year's learning growth in a year's time in reading and math. Revises certain criteria on which school letter grades are based, including permitting more than 50% of a high school's grade to be based on specified factors (previous legislation made specified factors 50% of a high school's letter grade). Includes Postseconary Education Readiness Test as part of calculation of high school's letter grade. Amends methodology for calculating a school district's grade. Requires district grades to be calculated using student performance and learning gains data on statewide assessments for students enrolled in a district for a full school year. http://myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h7127er.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=7127&Session=2012
Title: H.B. 7127 - School Improvement and Education Accountability
Source: myfloridahouse.gov
| |
| FL | Signed into law 06/2011 | P-12 | Authorizes school districts to provide a digital curriculum for students in grades 6 through 12 (Sec. 17). Requires a district's strategic plan to include plans to implement a middle school career and professional academy (Sec. 20). Eliminates the requirement that a student choose the 18 credit accelerated graduation option no later than ninth grade (Sec. 19). Authorizes school districts to select premethods and postmethods for determining student learning gains for supplemental educational service providers (Sec. 28).
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h1255er.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=1255&Session=2011
Title: H.B. 1255 - Sec. 17, 19, 20, 28
Source: http://www.myfloridahouse.gov
| |
| AR | Signed into law 03/2011 | P-12 | Enacts the "Supplemental 33 Educational Services Transparency Act." Directs providers to prepare and submit an annual report to districts where supplemental educational services are provided and place a copy of the report on its Web site. Reports must include information: (A) By race and gender, the improvement in student achievement for each student served based on the statewide benchmark tests orother statewide assessment of student achievement; (B) Student attendance rates; (C) The amount of funds the provider received per student; (D) By school district, the total number of supplemental 5 educational services contracts and the total amount of funds received under 6 those contracts; (E) The total number of years supplemental educational services have been provided and the total number of students served for all years; and (F) The results of parent satisfaction surveys.
Requires the department of education to review reports before placing providers on the department's list of state-approved providers. The department must include a link for parents to access information concerning approved providers on its website.
http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2011/2011R/Bills/HB2088.pdf
Title: H.B. 2088
Source: http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us
| |
| NM | Signed into law 03/2011 | P-12 | Relates to school improvement plans, corrective action and supplemental services for low-performing schools based on adequate yearly progress measures.
http://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/11%20Regular/final/HB0115.pdf
Title: H.B. 115
Source: http://www.nmlegis.gov
| |
| IL | Adopted 02/2011 | P-12 | From Illinois Register: Change in Section 675.50 enables supplemental education services (SES) providers of various sizes to submit financial records that have been affirmed as reliable by a knowledgeable person (i.e., a certified audit/audited financial statements or other verified financial statements). This new language seeks to balance the state board's need for reliable documentation against the unintended consequence of pricing smaller providers out of
the market and thus limiting parental choice, since the cost for a certified audit is often prohibitive for smaller providers.
Section 675.250 streamlines the process that entities must use if they want to appeal their removal by the agency from the list of approved SES providers with which districts may work. Page 477-483 of 734: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register_volume35_issue6.pdf
Title: 23 ADC 675.50, 250
Source: www.cyberdriveillinois.com
| |
| NY | Adopted 12/2009 | P-12 | Amends rule to implement the No Child Left Behind differentiated accountability pilot program. One of the key components of this rule is the repeal of the current paragraph 100.2(p)(6), "School Requiring Academic Progress", and its replacement with a new paragraph 100.2(p)(6), "Differentiated Accountability for Schools," beginning with the 2009-10 school year. The new paragraph will:
(1) Integrate federal and state accountability systems
(2) Reduce the number of school accountability categories by eliminating dual Title I and non-Title I streams of improvement
(3) Collapse identifications for improvement into three simplified accountability phases--Improvement, Corrective Action and Restructuring--based on the number of years a school failed to make adequate yearly progress (AYP) on an accountability performance criterion and/or accountability indicator
(4) Further differentiate each phase into three categories of intervention: Basic, Focused and Comprehensive, based upon the number of accountability groups that failed to make AYP in an accountability performance criterion and/or accountability indicator for which a school has been identified
(5) Determine a school's accountability designation for the 2009-2010 school year based upon the school's accountability status for the 2008-09 school year and the school's AYP for the 2007-08 and 2008-09 school years
(6) Provide schools with diagnostic tools, planning strategies, and supports and interventions specific to that phase in the improvement process and the school's category of need
(7) Allow for differentiation in the accountability process, permitting schools and districts to prepare and implement two-year school improvement/corrective action/restructuring plans that best match a school's designation
(8) Better align the School Under Registration Review (SURR) and NCLB processes and ensure that schools with systemic and persistent failure fundamentally restructure or close
(9) Maximize the state education department's limited resources and utilize the resources of the University of the State of New York (USNY) to assign School Quality Review Teams, Joint Intervention Teams, and Distinguished Educators to schools in improvement; strengthen the capacity of districts to assist schools to improve
(10) Empower parents by increasing combined participation in Public School Choice (PSC) and Supplemental Educational Services (SES) by providing for SES in the first year of a school's identification for improvement and PSC only after an identified school has failed to make AYP.
In addition, Section 100.2p(10) is amended to set forth the action that is to be taken when a school has been designated as Improvement, Corrective Action or Restructuring and has been placed on registration review. More specifically, under the amended regulations, requires a school designated as Improvement (year 1) or Corrective Action (year 1) to modify its plan to meet the requirements of a restructuring plan for implementation no later than the beginning of the school year following the year identified for registration review. The amended regulations also provide that a school designated as Restructuring (advanced) may be warned of revocation of registration unless an acceptable plan for closure or phase out has been submitted. Also allows a school identified for registration review to be identified for phase out or closure if progress has not been demonstrated after two full academic years of implementing a restructuring plan.
Adopted as published in the July 1, 2009 issue of the Register (pages 10-14 of 28): http://www.dos.state.ny.us/info/register/2009/jul1/pdfs/rules.pdf
Title: Title 8 NYCRR 100.2(p), 120.2, 120.3, 120.4
Source: www.dos.state.ny.us
| |
| IL | Adopted 11/2009 | P-12 | Eliminates requirement that supplemental education service (SES) provider's three years of experience serving youth be in the community where the applicant intends to offer SES. Clarifies parent satisfaction criteria in evaluation rubric for supplemental education service providers. Pages 421-429 of 432: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register_volume33_issue45.pdf
Title: 23 IAC 675.50, Appendix B
Source: www.cyberdriveillinois.com
| |
| IL | Signed into law 07/2009 | P-12 | Requires that a charter school comply with all provisions of the Educational Labor Relations Act. Provides that "educational employer" under the Educational Labor Relations Act includes the governing body of a charter school, a contract school or contract turnaround school or a subcontractor of instructional services of a school district, combination of school districts, charter school, or contract school or contract turnaround school. Specifies that "educational employer" under the Educational Labor Relations Act does not include an approved nonpublic special education facility that contracts with a school district or combination of school
districts to provide special education services. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB1984lv.pdf
Title: S.B. 1984
Source: www.ilga.gov
| |
| NY | Signed into law 07/2009 | P-12 | Amends chapter 425 of the laws of 2002, amending the education law relating to the provision of supplemental educational services, attendance at a safe public school and the suspension of pupils who bring a firearm to or possess a firearm at a school; amends chapter 101 of the laws of 2003, relating to implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, in relation to extending the effectiveness to June 30, 2010. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?default_fld=%0D%0A&bn=A08135&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y
Title: A.B. 8135
Source: assembly.state.ny.us
| |
| FL | Signed into law 06/2009 | P-12 | Relates to supplemental educational services; requires each school district to report information regarding state-approved supplemental educational services to public school students and parent satisfaction; requires for evaluation of each provider based on such information and the assignment of a service designation; authorizes school districts to use certain funds to meet the requirements of the act; requires reporting in electronic format of student learning gains; requires posting on a public website.
http://www.flsenate.gov/cgi-bin/view_page.pl?Tab=session&Submenu=1&FT=D&File=sb2538er.html&Directory=session/2009/Senate/bills/billtext/html/
Title: S.B. 2538
Source: http://www.flsenate.gov
| |
| IL | Adopted 06/2009 | P-12 | Amends rules concerning providers of supplemental educational services (SES). Adds a statement to the "Code of Ethics" section to make clear the applicability of these requirements to contractors and other entities acting in conjunction with providers. Adds a prohibition on marketing directly to students. Adds that district employees may be hired by an SES provider to provide non-instructional services. Clarifies that restrictions that apply to district staff in provision of SES services also apply to local board members and Chicago school council members. Specifies that each application for approval to provide SES in the state must include completed federal tax returns (or the equivalent for nonprofit entities) for the two most recent years and either an audit report or audited financial statements completed within two years prior to submission of the application. Requires SES providers, after the conclusion of SES for the reporting period, to report to the state superintendent only on students who received at least 18 hours of services. Specifies the report must include details on the resolution of any teacher or parent complaints received. Provides that each provider's performance will be determined on a statewide basis for each subject tutored (prior rule required provider's status to be determined on district-by-district basis.)
Adds that when a district notifies parents that the district's academic performance obligates the the offering of supplemental educational services, each district must post on its Web site (1) the number of students eligible for SES in each school year beginning with 2007-08; (2) the number of students who participated in SES in each school year beginning with 2007-08; (3) a list of the providers that are approved and have agreed to serve the district in the current school year; and (4) a list of the locations where each provider will offer services during the current school year. Adds provision related to students who do not receive a consultation on learning goals, measurement of progress toward those goals and a timetable for improving the student's academic achievement in the subjects tutored, by the time the student is to begin receiving tutoring. Adds transportation to and from SES in definition of "direct program expenses"; deletes transportation from section on non-reimbursable expenses.
Amends SES evaluation rubric in Appendix B and "Decision Matrix" in Appendix C. Pages 547-578 of 859: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register_volume33_issue25.pdf
Title: 23 IAC 675.30, .50, .70, .90, .175, .210, .220, .230, Appendix B, Appendix C
Source: www.cyberdriveillinois.com
| |
| GA | Adopted 10/2008 | P-12 | Amends rule related to supplemental educational services (SES) in Title I schools. Adds provision regarding "supplemental educational services compact," which outlines the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder including the local education agency (LEA), provider, parent/guardian, and student, as well as the cost/fee structure for providing services. Directs the state department of education to develop a database of potential providers as recommended by parents, LEAs, and members of the public.
Additionally directs the department to develop and apply criteria for a minimum number of instructional hours received in total by a student enrolled with a provider. Provides these criteria must include a maximum number of instructional hours students may receive per week, and the state education agency (SEA) will communicate this to all applicable parties every year.
Also directs the department to:
--Develop, implement and publicly report annually on the evaluation used to measure the impact SES has on student achievement.
--Develop and implement guidelines for SES implementation for both LEAs and approved SES providers.
--Develop and implement a code of ethics for approved SES providers.
--Develop and implement assurances to which all SES providers must agree annually prior to serving students.
--Exercise authority to investigate and remove providers from the state-approved providers list based on non-compliance with the state board rule 160-4-5-.03, assurances, providers code of ethics, signed compacts, approved SES application, SES standards, and for violations determined by the department that would constitute "cause" for removal.
--Develop and implement a protocol for removing providers from the state-approved providers list.
--Ensure any provider removed from the state-approved providers list, whether through state board action or the provider's request for removal, is not eligible to re-apply to serve students as an approved provider in Georgia for the next two consecutive school years.
--Provide the opportunity for a previously removed provider to re-apply to become an approved provider after a period of two consecutive school years. Upon approval of the application, allows the provider to serve students in the state again. Specifies that in the event the provider is recommended and removed from the state-approved providers list a second time, the provider will be barred permanently from applying to become a provider in the state.
Eliminates requirement that LEA provide student achievement data to provider serving such students. Replaces with more specific requirement that LEA make available to providers achievement data that must include but are not limited to applicable state assessments such as the Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT), Georgia High School Graduation Tests (GHSGT), and End of Course Tests (EOCT). Provides the applicable assessment data must indicate specific academic areas or strands of need in relevant subject areas. Specifies assessment data should be provided at the time contracts are signed with providers, and that data must be submitted to selected providers before students begin services. Specifies that LEAs must monitor the eligibility of students receiving SES and notify the SES provider and parent in writing when a student is no longer eligible for SES.
Expands upon provider responsibilities. Specifies that the cost of SES services must be in accordance with the state department of education's required minimum total number of instructional hours received per student. Also directs providers to:
--Ensure that pre- and post- assessments administered to SES students are valid and reliable.
--Explain the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder participating in SES using the Supplemental Educational Services Compact. Directs providers to make every attempt to acquire parent, and whenever applicable, student signatures on the document.
-- Develop Individual Student Plans (ISP) to set specific achievement goals for each student according to academic needs and subject area. Provides goals must be aligned with the Georgia Performance Standards (GPS).
--Ensure that parents have access to SES provider and/or designated LEA contact to discuss their child's academic progress.
--Conduct criminal background checks on all individuals who will have direct or indirect contact with students. Provides that failure to conduct a background check on any individual who is in contact with students either in person, by telephone, or internet will result in a recommendation to the state board that the provider be removed from the state-approved providers list. Sets parameters and requirements for background checks.
Notes that parents must notify the LEA if their child's provider does not begin service within 15 business days of notification, and must contact LEA and/or provider if contact information changes.
Rewrites and adds to provider criteria. New criteria require SES providers to:
--Document that instructional strategies used are high quality, based on research, and designed to increase student academic achievement.
--Document quantitative data demonstrating a record of effectiveness in improving student academic achievement.
--Maintain documentation indicating legal status to conduct business in the State of Georgia.
--Maintain documentation of current commercial general liability insurance with coverage for the State of Georgia.
Deletes provision that providers removed from the statewide list may reapply and specify geographical area(s) for their service
Specifies that any provider that accepts students and begins services for those students must complete the services and fulfill the signed contract for each student. Notes that any provider that terminates services to contracted participating students without written prior permission from the department will be recommended for removal from the state-approved providers list.
Directs providers to submit signed assurances (SES Provider application) annually by the department's specified date prior to beginning SES. Notes that any provider, whether newly approved or current, who does not submit signed and initialed assurances by the assigned deadline will be recommended for removal from the state-approved providers list.
Specifies that a provider may offer incentives to a student only AFTER the student has enrolled in the SES program for that provider. Notes that incentives must follow guidelines set forth in the SES Providers Code of Ethics, may only be for student attendance, program completion, or student achievement, and that enrollment incentives and incentives to parents and LEAs are NOT allowable at any time. Notes that providers not in compliance will be recommended for removal from the state-approved providers list.
Makes modifications to language relating to monitoring/evaluation of providers and the complaint process. Clarifies that the department reserves the authority to monitor any approved provider at will, and may conduct on-site monitoring visits without prior notice. Adds that failure to provide documentation of compliance with all SES Standards, State Board Rule 160-4-5-.03, and regulations during the time of the monitoring visit will result in a noncompliance rating.
Adds that the department will evaluate the effectiveness of providers in "other subjects" (in addition to reading, language arts and math) that are related to increasing student achievement on state academic assessments and that contribute to a particular school's ability to make Adequate Yearly Progress. Adds that the department will publicly report, at least annually, the overall performance rating of every provider site monitored for compliance with SES Standards, and will annually report the effectiveness of each provider's contribution to increasing the academic proficiency of students in reading, language arts, math and/or other subjects. http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-4-5-.03.pdf
Title: GAC 160-4-5-.03
Source: www.lexis.com
| |
| CA | Vetoed 09/2008 | P-12 | Relates to supplemental instructional programs for pupils who do not demonstrate sufficient progress toward passing the high school exit examination or for pupils who are recommended for retention or retained. Authorizes a school district or charter school offering these programs to offer courses that integrate instruction in English and mathematics and core curriculum areas with real-world applications delivered through project-based teaching strategies.
http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/acsframeset2text.htm
Title: S.B. 1442
Source: http://www.assembly.ca.gov
| |
| NY | Signed into law 06/2008 | P-12 | Extends the sunset date to June 30, 2009 on provisions related to supplemental educational services, attendance at a safe public school and the suspension of pupils who bring a firearm to or possess a firearm at school; relates to implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=S07672&sh=t
Title: S.B. 7672
Source: assembly.state.ny.us
| |
| FL | Signed into law 06/2008 | P-12 | Provides restrictions on charges by specified school districts for facility rental fees paid by state- approved supplemental educational services providers; requires the Department of Education to annually evaluate and grade supplemental education services providers; provides reporting requirements.
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_s1414er.DOC&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=1414&Session=2008
Title: S.B. 1414
Source: http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/
| |
| IL | Adopted 02/2008 | P-12 | Adds clarifying language regarding providers of supplemental education services. Amends various provisions related to providers' code of ethics, tutor qualifications and program location, application requirements, the application process, reporting requirements, criminal background checks of tutors, notification and election forms to parents of eligible students, good-faith estimates of providers' per-pupil district program costs, and reports of actual costs. Adds a new section to allow for mid-year changes in the offering of supplemental education services.
599-625 of 681: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register_volume32_issue11.pdf
Title: 23 IAC 675
Source: www.cyberdriveillinois.com
| |
| LA | Adopted 10/2007 | P-12 | Consolidates and improves upon regulatory language regarding supplemental service providers.
Title: LAC 28:CXXV.Chapter 1
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| NY | Signed into law 07/2007 | P-12 | Relates to the provision of supplemental educational services, attendance at a safe public school, the suspension of pupils who bring a firearm to or possess a firearm at a school (chapter 425 of the laws of 2002) and the education law relating to implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (chapter 101 of the laws of 2003. Extends the effectiveness of these provisions to June 30, 2008. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=S05747&sh=t
Title: S.B. 5747
Source: assembly.state.ny.us
| |
| AZ | Signed into law 04/2007 | P-12 | Requires the Department of Education to provide a single achievement profile to schools that offer instruction in grades K-12 or a combination of the grades and requires the State Board of Education to define the size of an extremely small school that must receive a parallel achievement profile from the Department of Education. The profile shall be used to determine a school classification that designates each school as one of the following: a) an excelling school; b) a highly performing school; c) a performing school; d) an underperforming school; or e) a school failing to meet academic standards. Profile is based on state assessment tests. Grades 9-12 profiles consists of the test results, annual dropout rate, annual graduation rate and results of the English language learners tests.
http://www.azleg.gov/DocumentsForBill.asp?Bill_Number=HB2039
Title: H.B. 2039
Source: http://www.azleg.gov
| |
| CO | Signed into law 03/2007 | P-12 | Concerns requirements on providers of supplemental education services, such as those under No Child Left Behind. The department of education must provide an annual request application for service providers, which will result in a list of approved providers. All providers must meet certain criteria, with regard to tutor qualifications, employee background checks and payment advertisement.
http://www.leg.state.co.us/Clics/Clics2007A/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/9B463A0DFC95978D87257251007D54CC?Open&file=1077_enr.pdf
Title: H.B. 1077
Source: Colorado Legislature
| |
| NY | Adopted 03/2007 | P-12 | Prescribes requirements regarding the use of rewards and incentives by SES providers, revises reporting dates for SES providers and local education agencies, and corrects inaccurate references in the SES regulations.
Title: Title 8 NYCRR Section 120.4
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| CA | Signed into law 09/2006 | P-12 | Permits use of state and local funds if a school is required to contract with an outside entity for supplemental instruction to high-priority pupils. Revises the High Priority Schools Grant Program to require the Superintendent to invite a 2nd cohort of schools into the program for the 2005-06 fiscal year. Revises the application procedure, conditions requiring state monitoring of schools in the grant program, and procedures for establishment of school assistance and intervention teams for certain schools.
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_2251-2300/ab_2254_bill_20060907_enrolled.pdf
Title: A.B. 2254
Source: California Legislature
| |
| IL | Adopted 08/2006 | P-12 | Establishes increased regulation of the supplemental educational services industry and additional assistance for districts with implementation. Clarifies the application, monitoring and removal processes to hold providers accountable. Ensures that providers' rates reflect the actual cost of services. Provides additional resources to districts for the administration of Supplemental Educational Services. Pages 146-175 of 215: http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/index/register/register_volume30_issue35.pdf
Title: 23 IAC 675.30, .60, .70, .90, .100, 150, .175, .210, .240, .245, Appendix A, B, C
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| LA | Adopted 06/2006 | P-12 | Full text of language on pages 8-20 of 62: http://www.doa.louisiana.gov/osr/reg/0606/0606RUL.pdf
Changes define/outline/clarify the following:
--school performance score goals (page 8-10 of 62);
--calculating the SPS (School Performance Scores) component (pp 11-12 of 62);
--incentive points for a school in which a repeating 4th or 8th grade student scores at a higher achievement level on a LEAP test of math, English language arts, science or social studies than the previous spring (p of 62);
--calculating a K-8 assessment index (pp 12-13 of 62);
--calculating a 9-12 assessment index (p 13 of 62);
--the state assessments in which students in grades 3-11 will participate in annually (p 13 of 62);
--inclusion of schools (pp 13-14 of 62);
--pairing/sharing of schools with insufficient test data (p 14 of 62);
--growth targets (pp 14-15 of 62);
--defining, determining a cohort for, documenting and calculating a graduation index (pp 15-16 of 62);
--calculating a graduation rate (p 17 of 62);
--subgroup component indicators and failing the subgroup component (pp 16-17 of 62);
--safe harbor (pp 16-17 of 62);
--levels of academic assistance (p 17 of 62);
--levels of school improvement, entry into and exit from school improvement, school improvement requirements and state support at each level (pp 17-18 of 62);
--recovery school district (p 19 of 62);
--inclusion of alternative education students and option considerations (p 19 of 62);
--valid data considerations and NRT/CRT data (pp 19-20 of 62);
--attendance and dropout/exit data (p 20 of 62);
--and subgroup component adequate yearly progress (p 20 of 62).
Chapter 45, Disaster Consideration for School and District Accountability, is a proposed amendment designed to address the impacts of Hurricane Katrina and Rita and other disasters that may occur.
Title: LAC 28:LXXXIII.Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 17, 21, 24, 35, 41,43, and 45
Source: www.doa.louisiana.gov
| |
| OK | Adopted 04/2006 | P-12 | Amends rules for supplemental education organizations. Establishes an approval process for courses offered by these organizations to be counted for academic credit and toward meeting graduation requirements.
OKLAHOMA 13924
Title: OAC 210:35-9-31
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| UT | Signed into law 03/2006 | P-12 | This bill provides stipends for supplemental instruction to students who have not passed the Utah Basic Skills Competency Test, funding to implement proposals to improve mathematics achievement test scores in grades four through six, and makes modifications to the Utah Orderly School Termination Procedures Act (see separate record in this database for more details on dismissal provision). Specifies eligibility requirements for students to receive a stipend for basic skills education; establishes stipend amounts; requires basic skills providers to accept students for instruction on a first come/first served basis; allows a basic skills provider to charge a stipend recipient an additional amount above the stipend amount; provides that a basic skills provider shall receive payment in the amount of the stipend if the stipend recipient passes the subtest for which the basic skills provider provided instruction; requires the State Board of Education to administer the Basic Skills Education Stipend Program and make rules; requires the Legislature to annually appropriate money from the General Fund for stipends for basic skills education; directs the State Board of Education to issue a request for proposals from school districts and charter schools to improve mathematics achievement test scores of students in grades four through six; requires the proposals to use professional development, incentive bonuses, or a combination of both, as a strategy to improve mathematics achievement test scores; requires the State Board of Education to: give priority to Title I schools in awarding funding to implement proposals; and report to the Education Interim Committee on the implementation of proposals to improve mathematics achievement test scores; specifies procedures for the termination or discontinuation of a career employees's contract; and appropriates money for stipends for basic skills education and to implement proposals to improve mathematics achievement test scores of students in grades four through six.Appropriates for fiscal year 2006-07 only, $7,500,000 from the General Fund to the State Board; and for fiscal year 2006-07 only, $7,500,000 from the Uniform School Fund to the State Board of Education.
http://www.le.state.ut.us/~2006/bills/hbillenr/hb0181.pdf
Title: H.B. 181
Source: http://www.le.state.ut.us
| |
| NM | Signed into law 03/2006 | P-12 | If a public school fails to make adequate yearly progress for three or more consecutive school years, it is required to provide supplemental services, including after-school programs, tutoring and summer services to its Title I eligible students, within available funds. Requires the department to adopt rules that govern the priority for students for whom supplemental services shall be provided and for students for whom transportation costs are paid. The rules are to include the adoption of a sliding-fee schedule based on the educational level of tutors in New Mexico; and require that providers use a pre- and post-assessment instrument approved by the department to measure the gains that students achieve through supplemental services. (Chapter No. 83)
http://legis.state.nm.us/Sessions/06%20Regular/FinalVersions/senate/SB0100.pdf
Title: S.B. 100
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| GA | Adopted 10/2005 | P-12 | Clarifies rules regarding supplemental educational services in Title I Schools.
AGENCY CONTACT: Patricia Mills, Department of Education, 2052 Twin Towers East, Atlanta, GA 30334, 404-656- 4689, fax 404-657-8376
http://public.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-4-5-.03.pdf
Title: GAC 160-4-5-.03
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| GA | Adopted 07/2005 | P-12 | Clarifies rules regarding the statewide accountability system, including definitions, profiles and awards and school- and district-level consequences. Also sets forth state audit and record retention requirements for schools and districts. http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-7-1-.04.pdf
Title: GAC 160-7-1-.01 thru -.04
Source: www.doe.k12.ga.us
| |
| IL | Emergency Rule Adoption 07/2005 | P-12 | Creates rules for providers of Supplemental Education Services, addressing a code of ethics, programmatic requirements, approval criteria, procedures, reporting requirements, sanctions, public information, provider's relationship with the district and various financial requirements. http://www.isbe.state.il.us/rules/proposed/pdfs/675wf.pdf
Title: 23 IAC 675.10, thru .100, .150, .200, .210, thru .240
Source: www.isbe.state.il.us
| |
| NY | Signed into law 06/2005 | P-12 | AN ACT to amend chapter 425 of the laws of 2002, amending the education law relating to the provision of supplemental educational services, attendance at a safe public school and the suspension of pupils who bring a firearm to or possess a firearm at a school and chapter 101 of the laws of 2003, amending the education law relating to implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=S05415&sh=t
Title: S.B. 5415
Source: StateNet
| |
| CO | Vetoed 06/2005 | P-12 | Recognizes the importance of supplemental online education courses, especially to smaller districts and rural schools. States that such courses are eligible to receive funding from the state education fund created in article IX of the state constitution. Requires the department, on or before October 1, 2005, to contract with a supplemental on-line course provider to provide high-quality supplemental on-line education courses statewide for purchase by districts, boards of cooperative services, charter schools and the state charter school institute. Requires the contracting provider to work with these entities to allow schools to (1) offer courses for all students in all performance ranges, including gifted and talented students and students in need of remediation; (2) resolve class scheduling conflicts; (3) provide make-up credits for students and summer school options to help students graduate earlier; (4) offer courses for expelled and home-bound students; (5) offer courses for which local teachers are not available; (6) offer courses allowing students to meet higher education admission requirements; (7) meet federal requirements for highly qualified teachers; and (8) provide teacher professional development. Requires the supplemental online course provider to be a nonprofit or not-for-profit organization or school district, have documented evidence of program evaluation, and to meet other requirements. Specifies minimum provisions of a contract for supplemental online education courses, including that the contractor must provide at least 50 online courses in specified subject areas, the teachers meet the federal requirements for a highly qualified teacher, and that, where applicable, the courses are based on the state model content standards. Requires the contractors to annually report to the department and the legislature on specified details about the program during the preceding year. Makes an allocation.
http://www.leg.state.co.us/Clics2005a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/4723DE9EE54766D487256F810074794F?Open&file=139_enr.pdf
Title: S.B. 139
Source: www.leg.state.co.us
| |
| CA | Signed into law 08/2004 | P-12 | Authorizes a public officer or agency to allow the use of records concerning a individual that relates to free or reduced-price meal eligibility by a school district employee to identify pupils eligible for public school choice and supplemental educational services as required by the No Child Left Behind Act, if certain conditions are met. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1601-1650/ab_1636_bill_20040830_chaptered.html
Title: A.B. 1636
Source: California Legislative Web site
| |
| GA | Adopted 07/2004 | P-12 | Establishes rules regarding supplemental education services (SES). Defines roles and responsibilities of state and local education agencies and the SES providers in delivering services to students in schools required to offer SES. http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-4-5-.03.pdf
Title: GAC 160-4-5-.03
Source: Georgia Legislative Web site
| |
| LA | Adopted 04/2004 | P-12 | Adopts rules relating to the implementation of fundamental changes in the classroom by helping schools and communities focus on student achievement. Clarifies method for calculating a School Performance Score for elementary, middle and high schools. Establishes timelines for schools in School Improvement to submit improvement plans, expands the details of the Supplemental Educational Services process, specifies how LEAP Alternative Assessment students are included in NRT calculations, and creates required definitions for English language proficiency. http://www.doa.state.la.us/osr/reg/0404/0404RUL.pdf (see pages 22-27 of 71)
Title: LAC 28:LXXXIII.303, 311, 1701, 2701, 2702, 2703, 2713, 2715, 2717, 2719, 2721, 3905, 4001, 4003, 4005
Source: http://www.doa.state.la.us/osr
| |
| AR | Signed into law 01/2004 | P-12 | Adds Ark. Code 6-15-1903. Students attending schools receiving an annual performance category Level 1 for two consecutive years must be offered supplemental educational services. http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/ftproot/bills/2003s2/public/SB33.pdf
Title: S.B. 33 § 6
Source: Arkansas Legislative Web site
| |
| CA | Vetoed 10/2003 | P-12 | Repeals existing law requiring a school district to offer supplemental instruction to pupils in grades 2 to 9, inclusive, who are
recommended for retention or who are retained in the same grade. Existing law requires the superintendent of public instruction to notify the director of finance if there is a deficiency of funding for purposes of certain supplemental instructional programs. Amended law requires notification 30 days before it is necessary to use available funding for supplemental instruction. SB 19 will become effective only if AB 52 is enacted and becomes effective by January 1, 2004. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051-0100/ab_52_bill_20030908_enrolled.html
Title: A.B. 52
Source: California Legislative Web site
| |
| CA | Vetoed 10/2003 | P-12 | Removes the funding limitation of a school district or charter school for supplemental instruction to a pupil who is at risk of retention in the same grade. Revises the funding limitation for supplemental instruction for a pupil who is deficient in mathematics, reading or written expression. This bill would become effective only if AB 52 is enacted and becomes effective on or before January 1, 2004. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sb_19_bill_20030911_enrolled.html
Title: S.B. 19
Source: California Legislative Web site
| |
| NY | Signed into law 09/2003 | P-12 | Requires that a criminal background check be performed on any individual who is employed by a supplemental education services provider.
Title: S.B. 5546
Source: StateNet
| |
| OH | Signed into law 08/2003 | P-12 | This section requires the district to spend a combined total of of the funds it receives under Title I, Part A, to provide transportation for students who enroll in alternative buildings and to pay the costs of the supplemental educational services provided to students, unless the district can satisfy all demand for transportation and pay the costs of supplemental services for those students who request them with a lesser amount. In allocating the funds, the district must spend at least 5% of such funds to provide transportation, unless it can satisfy all demand with a lesser amount, and at least 5% of such funds to pay the costs of supplemental services, unless it can pay the costs of such services for all students requesting them with a lesser amount. If 20% is insufficient to satisfy all demand for transportation and supplemental services, the district must give priority to the lowest achieving students among the subgroup of economically disadvantaged students. Districts that do not receive federal Title I funds are not required to provide these services.
Title: H.B. 3--Sec. 3302.04
Source: www.legislature.state.oh.us
| |
| NY | Signed into law 07/2003 | P-12 | Classifies any person who works for a supplemental educational services provider, BOCES, or charter school, or who provides supplemental educational services to children, as an employee of the school district for purposes of provisions of law relating to child abuse.
Title: S.B. 5061
Source: StateNet
| |
| OK | Adopted 07/2003 | P-12 | Adds a new section of law (Section 19). Allows the Virtual Internet School Pilot Program Coordinating Committee to establish cooperative partnerships with private Oklahoma-based companies. Any products, processes, or ideas, including the software integration engines, developed from the collaborative effort of the partnership are to be constructed in a manner to assist school districts and the state in complying with the guidelines of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2001 (ESEA), P.L. No. 107-110, also known as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and shall be in accordance with the following standards or guidelines: 1. Extensible Markup Language (XML); 2. Web services, a protocol developed by the World Wide Web Consortium; 3. Schools Interoperability Framework (SIF) version 1.5 specifications or any updated version of the specifications; and 4. The United States Department of Education Performance-Based Data Management Initiative (PBDMI). Requires the Committee to establish criteria upon which to evaluate a company for a partnership established pursuant to this section. The criteria may include, but is not limited to the: 1. Quality or technical competency of the company and its products; 2. Financial stability of the company; 3. Reliability of the delivery and implementation schedules of the company; 4. Industry and program experience of the company and record of successful past performance with web-based projects of similar scope and complexity in Oklahoma; 5. Anticipated acceptance by user groups; and 6. Use of proven development methodology by the company, and innovative use of current technologies that lead to quality results. By January 1, 2004, the Committee must report to the state board and the legislature the results of any distribution, collaboration, and marketing efforts resulting from the partnership formed pursuant to the section. Also, this bill makes rewards for school performance contingent on state funding. http://www2.lsb.state.ok.us/2003-04HB/hb1767_enr.rtf
Title: H.B. 1767 (Omnibus Bill)
Source: http://www2.lsb.state.ok.us
| |
| CA | Emergency Rule Adoption 06/2003 | P-12 | Defines "demonstrated record of effectiveness" for supplemental educational services providers who are approved by the state board of education. http://ccr.oal.ca.gov/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?clientID=927502&advquery=13075&infobase=ccr&record={10314}&softpage=Search_Frame_Pg42&x=22&y=14&zz=
Title: Title 5 CCR 13075
Source: California State Web site
| |
| NY | Rule Adoption 06/2003 | P-12 | Amends rules to conform the commissioner's regulations to Federal regulations and guidance relating to implementation of the public school choice and supplemental educational services provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. NEW YORK REG 15781 (SN)
Title: NYCRR Title 8 120.3, 120.4
Source: StateNet
| |
| MN | Signed into law 05/2003 | P-12 | Allows state commissioner of education to adopt rules establishing criteria for identifying, annually reviewing, and formally listing eligible supplemental education service providers throughout Minnesota, consistent with applicable federal requirements and Minnesota's application for supplemental education service providers under Title 1, Part A, of the No Child Left Behind Act. This section is effective the day following final enactment and applies to supplemental education service providers delivering supplemental English or math services to eligible students in the 2003-2004 school year and later.
See Article 2, Section 3: http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/bldbill.pl?bill=H0302.1&session=ls83
Title: H.F. 302 (multiple provisions)
Source: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us
| |
| NJ | Active 11/2002 | P-12 | RFP: http://www.state.nj.us/njded/grants/nclb/supplemental_rfp.pdf
Providers list: http://www.state.nj.us/njded/grants/nclb/policy/ssp.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: New Jersey Department of Education
| |
| VT | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Approved supplemental service providers (revised 10/15/02): http://www.state.vt.us/educ/new/pdfdoc/laws/nclba/supp_providers.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: Vermont Department of Education Web site
| |
| LA | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Notice that supplemental services application will be available on Web site October 18, 2002 with a November 15, 2002 closing date: (http://www.doe.state.la.us/DOE/OQE/PublicNotice.doc)
Instructions about applying: (http://www.doe.state.la.us/DOE/OQE/Summary.doc)
Title: N/A
Source: Louisiana Department of Education Web site
| |
| AL | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services RFP; closing date: November 15, 2002. ftp://ftp.alsde.edu/documents/57/Supplemental%20Service%20Provider%20RFP2.doc
Title: N/A
Source: Alabama Department of Education Web site
| |
| AR | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services RFP (not dated); closing date: November 1, 2002: http://arkedu.state.ar.us/pdf/rfp_proposal2002.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: Arkansas Department of Education Web site
| |
| AZ | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Services Web page: http://www.ade.az.gov/asd/title1/ses/default.asp
- Supplemental Education Services application and scoring rubric (dated 10/3/02); closing date: 10/30/02 (http://www.ade.az.gov/asd/title1/ses/SupplementalServicesAppOct2002.pdf)
- Approved providers by county (undated list): (http://www.ade.az.gov/asd/title1/ses/countydistrictlist.pdf)
- Approved providers in alphabetical order (undated list): (http://www.ade.az.gov/asd/title1/ses/SSproviderschart.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Arizona Department of Education Web site
| |
| CA | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Services Web page: (http://www.cde.ca.gov/iasa/titleone/pi/supservices.html)
-Supplemental Services RFP (dated May 2002); closing date:June 14, 2002:(http://www.cde.ca.gov/iasa/titleone/pi/supservapp.rtf
-2002-2003 eligible schools for supplemental services (updated 9/17/02): (http://www.cde.ca.gov/iasa/titleone/pi/supservschools.html)
-Approved providers:(http://www.cde.ca.gov/iasa/titleone/pi/ssproviders.html) and (http://www.cde.ca.gov/iasa/titleone/pi/ssproviders2.html)
Title: N/A
Source: California Department of Education Web site
| |
| DC | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services RFP; closing date: October 21, 2002: (http://www.k12.dc.us/dcps/what%27s_new/Supplemental%20SrvcRqst-NCLB.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: District of Columbia Public Schools Web site
| |
| GA | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | - Supplemental education services providers application (dated 9/23/02); closing date: 11/16/02 (http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/federal/nclb/_documents/providers_application.pdf)
- List of approved supplemental education service providers (updated 9/13/02): (http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/federal/nclb/_documents/service_providers.pdf)
- Information for parents: http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/federal/nclb/nclb_parents.html
Title: N/A
Source: Georgia Department of Education Web site
| |
| HI | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | - Supplemental Education Services Application (closing date: August 15, 2002): (http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:bzemN8wS56YC:doe.k12.hi.us/nclb/changes/020726takahashi/prospectus.htm+supplemental+services&hl=en&ie=UTF-8)
- Information for parents: http://doe.k12.hi.us/nclb/index.htm
Title: N/A
Source: Hawaii Department of Education Web site
| |
| KY | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services RFP; closing date 10/15/02: (http://www.kde.state.ky.us/osis/resources/ssRFP.asp - page expires 10/15/02)
Title: N/A
Source: Kentucky Department of Education Web site
| |
| MI | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental education services application; applications accepted on a continuous basis: (http://www.michigan.gov/documents/Supplemental_Service_Providers_Application_40465_7.pdf)
Supplemental education services web page: (http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-6525_6530_6559-49582--,00.html)
Title: N/A
Source: Michigan Department of Education Web site
| |
| ND | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | List of approved supplement service providers: http://www.dpi.state.nd.us/title1/targeted/general/list.shtm
Supplemental services application; deadline was 8/20/02): http://www.dpi.state.nd.us/news/rfp82002.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: North Dakota Department of Public Instruction
| |
| NH | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Services application; deadline 10/7/2002: (http://www.ed.state.nh.us/RFPs/Title%20I%20supplemental%20services%20RFP.htm)
Title: N/A
Source: New Hampshire Department of Education Web site
| |
| NV | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | -Supplemental Services application; deadline 8/2/2002: (http://www.nde.state.nv.us/nclb/providers/RFA.app.new.doc)
-Application cover letter: http://www.nde.state.nv.us/nclb/providers/RFA.memo.doc
-Scoring Rubric: http://www.nde.state.nv.us/nclb/providers/RFA.rubric.doc
-Note on web site states: "The Nevada Department of Education's decision regarding who will be included on the Supplemental Educational Services provider list has been postponed, pending approval of the criteria, by the Nevada State Board of Education in October 2002. Because no schools will be required to offer supplemental services prior to September 2003, this delay should not create difficulties for potential providers." (http://www.nde.state.nv.us/nclb/)
Title: N/A
Source: Nevada Department of Education Web site
| |
| NY | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | List of approved supplemental education service providers: http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/nyc/SES/ApprovedProviders/AlphaCountyChoice.html
Title: N/A
Source: New York Department of Education Web site
| |
| OK | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Approved supplemental service providers: (http://www.sde.state.ok.us/pro/SuppServ/providerlist.html)
Supplemental Services application; continuous application process: (http://www.sde.state.ok.us/acrob/SUPPeducSERVrfp.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Oklahoma Department of Education Web site
| |
| SC | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | 2002-2003 approved supplemental service providers:(http://www.myscschools.com/offices/cso/Title_I/supp_service.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: South Carolina Department of Education Web site
| |
| TX | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services application (deadline 12/1/02 for addition to initial approved list): (http://www.tea.state.tx.us/nclb/sip/ProviderApplication.pdf)
Approved providers: (http://www.tea.state.tx.us/nclb/SESProviderInfo.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Texas Department of Education Web site
| |
| UT | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services RFP; deadline 10/1/02: (http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/curr/nclb/pdf/SupServProvApp.pdf)
Application Rubric: (http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/curr/nclb/pdf/SupServRub.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Utah Department of Education Web site
| |
| WA | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental services application; deadline 8/25/02: (http://www.k12.wa.us/ESEA/pubdocs/SupServAPP-RFP.pdf)
Application received after the closing date will be reviewed within 6 months and approved providers will be added to subsequent lists. Approved providers will be required to renew their applications annually.
Supplemental education services providers approved 10/1/02; additional providers will be approved January 2003: (http://www.k12.wa.us/ESEA/pubdocs/ApprovedProviders.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Washington Department of Education Web site
| |
| WI | Active 10/2002 | P-12 | - Supplemental Services web page: (http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/esea/supplemental.html)
- Supplement services application; deadline 11/15/02: (http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/esea/9550/9550_s.doc)
- Approved providers (9/02): (http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/esea/providers.html)
- Supplemental education services agreement: (http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/esea/9550/q02_17.doc)
Completed applications are due Aug. 15. This is not a competitive process. Providers that meet the criteria specified on the application will be included on the state-approved Supplemental Educational Services Provider List. The DPI will update the list in January 2003 (deadline Nov. 15), and thereafter annually (deadline June 1).
Title: N/A
Source: Wisconsin Department of Education Web site
| |
| CA | Vetoed 09/2002 | P-12 | Repeals the provisions that would become operative on 1/1/2003 that would require a school district to offer supplemental instruction to pupils in grades 2 to 9 who are recommended for retention or who are retained in the same grade. Deletes the repeal date of provisions authorizing a school district to offer programs of supplemental instruction to pupils in grades 2 to 6 in specified subjects based on results of statewide achievement tests.
Title: A.B. 2130
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| CA | Signed into law 09/2002 | P-12 | Requires the Department of Education to establish a statewide system of school support to provide intensive and sustained support and technical assistance for school districts and county offices of education with schools in need of improvement. Requires the department to allocate funding for purposes of corrective actions undertaken at schools in need of improvement. Establishes an advisory liaison team on the No Child Left Behind Act.
Title: A.B. 312
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| MT | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services Application; deadline 9/30/02: (http://www.opi.state.mt.us/pdf/TitleI/SuppEdServ.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Montana Department of Public Instruction Web site
| |
| MO | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services RFP; deadline 12/6/02: (http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divimprove/nclb/Supplemental%20RFP.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Missouri Department of Education Web site
| |
| IL | Adopted 09/2002 | P-12 | Illinois State Board of Education adopted criteria for approving supplemental education service providers on 9/19/2002. (no policy number given). The criteria covers the following areas: evidence of effectiveness, evidence of program quality, instructional program, monitoring student progress, communication of student progress, qualifications of instructional staff, financial soundness and organization capacity, and compliance with federal, state and local health, safety and civil rights law. (http://www.isbe.state.il.us/nclb/htmls/sesp.htm)
Service provider application: http://www.isbe.state.il.us/nclb/pdfs/sespapp.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: Illinois State Board of Education Web site
| |
| NM | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Services RFP; Deadline 10/8/02http://www.state.nm.us/spd/rfp300000000045.doc
Title: N/A
Source: New Mexico Department of Education Web site
| |
| AK | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services Providers Application; application process open continuously; applications will be reviewed periodically. http://www.eed.state.ak.us/nclb/pdf/SSP_RFA.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: Alaska Department of Education Web site
| |
| CO | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | State Approved Supplemental Service Providers -- http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeunified/download/SS-AllProviders_ProgDescripts.pdf
Link to main supplemental services page: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeunified/suppedprov.htm
Title: N/A
Source: Colorado Department of Education Web Site
| |
| IA | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services application; closing date 9/13/02: http://www.state.ia.us/educate/ecese/asis/titlei/doc/sespapp04.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: Iowa Department of Education Web site
| |
| ID | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services application; closing date September 16, 2002: http://www.sde.state.id.us/comped/docs/SupplementalServices.doc
Title: N/A
Source: Idaho Department of Education Web site
| |
| KY | 09/2002 | P-12 | Kentucky's Education Department approved criteria for selecting supplemental-services providers for students
in low-performing schools. Among other criteria, applicants must:
Have a demonstrated record of effectiveness or have a high probability of increasing student academic achievement.
Provide supplemental educational services that are consistent with state academic standards (The Standards and Indicators for School Improvement, Kentucky Core Content and Kentucky Student Performance Descriptors).
Provide research-based instruction that is of high quality and designed to increase student achievement.
Meet all applicable federal, state and local health, safety and civil rights laws.
Provide instruction and content that is secular, neutral and non-ideological.
Provide parents of children receiving services with information on progress of children in increasing achievement, in a format and, to the extent practicable, a language that parents can understand.
Be financially sound.
Provide instruction in addition to what is provided during the school day.
Title: N/A
Source: http://www.kde.state.ky.us/osis/resources/rfp.rtf
| |
| NE | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services application; deadline 10/15/2002: (http://www.nde.state.ne.us/TITLE1/nesspapp.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Nebraska Department of Education Web site
| |
| PA | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | -Supplemental Education Services web page; includes instruction for applying and application; application deadline 9/23/02: (http://www.pde.state.pa.us/nclb/cwp/view.asp?a=3&Q=82596)
- Approved providers: (http://www.pde.state.pa.us/nclb/lib/nclb/finalSESProviders.pdf)
- Approved SES providers must renew their applications annually.
Title: N/A
Source: Pennsylvania Department of Education Web site
| |
| VA | Active 09/2002 | P-12 | - Board approved criteria (7/25/02): (http://www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/nclb/boe/Supplmtl_srvcs_criteria.pdf)
- Supplemental Services RFP (initial proposal deadline 9/7/02): (http://www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/nclb/ssp_app.doc)
- Supplemental providers approved by Board on 9/26/02: (http://www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/suptsmemos/2002/adm064a.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Virginia Department of Education Web site
| |
| WV | Active 08/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Services RFP; approval period 9/1/02 to 6/30/03: (http://wvde.state.wv.us/tt/2002/supplementalserviceproviderRFP.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: West Virginia Department of Education Web site
| |
| DE | Active 08/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services application; closing date: (August 30, 2002: http://www.doe.state.de.us/SchoolImprovement/) Look under "Technical Assistance and Professional Development."
Title: N/A
Source: Delaware Department of Education Web site
| |
| FL | Signed into law 08/2002 | P-12 | Creates "directory" section to inform tutors of obligation to keep and prepare records in accordance with other statutes. See bill section 108, page 306, line 18, ff: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/data/session/2002E/Senate/bills/billtext/pdf/s0020Eer.pdf
Title: S.B. 20E
Source: www.leg.state.fl.us
| |
| IN | Active 08/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services Application (dated August 2002); closing date: 10/4/02 (http://paris.doe.state.in.us/downloads/SuppServicesApp.doc)
Title: N/A
Source: Indiana Department of Education Web site
| |
| MA | Signed into law 08/2002 | P-12 | Permits districts to establish full-time or part-time preschool, after-school or summer school programs English language learners programs, although these programs may not substitute for English language learners programs provided during the regular school year. http://www.state.ma.us/legis/bills/house/ht05010.htm
Title: H.B. 5010
Source: http://www.state.ma.us/legis/bills/house/ht05010.htm
| |
| NY | Signed into law 08/2002 | P-12 | Amends the Education Law to conform to the provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001; directs the Commissioner of Education to establish procedures for the approval of providers of supplemental educational services; authorizes school districts to contract with approved supplemental educational service providers selected by students' parents. Also adds compliance provisions for safe schools under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A11858&sh=t
Title: A.B. 11858
Source: http://assembly.state.ny.us
| |
| TN | Active 08/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services web page: (http://www.state.tn.us/education/acctsupplemental.htm)
Supplemental Services application (deadline 8/9/02): (http://www.state.tn.us/education/acctsupplementalapp.pdf)
Approved providers: (http://www.state.tn.us/education/accttennesseessp.pdf)
Title: N/A
Source: Tennessee Department of Education Web site
| |
| KS | Active 07/2002 | P-12 | Supplemental Education Services Application; closing date: August 15, 2002 (http://www.ksde.org/sfp/titleI/supplementalsvc.doc)
Title: N/A
Source: Kansas Department of Education Web site
| |
| MD | Signed into law 07/2002 | P-12 | Allows, if federal funds are sufficient, districts in addition to Baltimore and Prince George's County to apply to department for grants to participate in the Maryland Educational Opportunity Summer Pilot Program. Extends pilot program through June 30, 2007. http://mlis.state.md.us/2002rs/bills/hb/hb1370t.rtf
Title: H.B. 1370
Source: mlis.state.md.us
| |
| NC | Active 07/2002 | P-12 | Application cover letter (7/22/02): http://www.ncpublicschools.org/esea/intro_letter.pdf
Supplemental Education Services information, application and approval process (7/18/02); deadline 8/16/02): http://www.ncpublicschools.org/esea/SESPapp.pdf
Title: N/A
Source: North Carolina Department of Education Web site
| |
| CA | Signed into law 06/2002 | P-12 | Allows Fresno Unified School District to apply for a waiver from certain regulations so as to allow the district to use designated funds for pupils at Cooper Middle School performing below basic or far below basic in math and reading on the California Standards Tests an instructional day 60 minutes longer than at other middle schools in the district instead of offering supplemental instructional programs the monies were originally intended to provide. Cooper Middle School may also offer an instructional day 60 minutes longer than at other district middle schools to students who have scored above below basic on the math and reading portions of the California Standards Tests. Includes parental opt-out, which requires that children be placed in a regular program at another district middle school. Program must be evaluated by state superintendent and reported on to general assembly by December 31, 2004. Section repealed as of January 1, 2005. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_1251-1300/ab_1285_bill_20020621_chaptered.html
Title: A.B. 1285
Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
| |
| CO | Signed into law 05/2002 | P-12 | Expands the Summer School Grant Program to provide funding to school districts for the operation of intensive literacy and reading comprehension education services to students preparing to enter the first grade who scored at an unsatisfactory level on the kindergarten reading readiness assessment. Only schools providing full-day kindergarten are eligible to apply for grant funds. The department is encouraged to apply for "No Child Left Behind" funds to help support the program. Bill also reduces the funds available to qualifying schools in the teacher pay incentive program for low-performing schools. http://www.leg.state.co.us/2002a/inetcbill.nsf/fsbillcont/FAB1CA6943E47F8F87256B3C004D317E?Open&file=1304_enr.pdf
Title: H.B. 1304
Source: www.leg.state.co.us
| |
| DE | Signed into law 05/2002 | P-12 | Before enactment of this legislation, this subparagraph banned any 3rd-, 5th- or 8th-grader scoring Well Below the Standard on the state reading assessment from being promoted to the next grade unless the student participated in a summer school program and attained a proficient-level score on the state reading assessment before the start of the new school year. The subparagraph now states that a 3rd-, 5th- or 8th-grader scoring Well Below the Standard on the state reading assessment may not be promoted to the next grade unless he/she attends a summer school program and scores at Below the Standard or above on the state reading assessment before the start of the next school year and, if the student at the end of summer school scores at Below the Standard, the student's parents/guardian and the district agree upon an individual improvement plan. In addition, a separate subparagraph barred any 8th-grader performing Well Below the Standard on the state math assessment from being promoted to the next grade unless he/she attended summer school and attained a proficient score on the state math assessment before the beginning of the new school year. The new legislation changes this such that now no 8th-grader scoring Well Below the Standard on the state math assessment can be promoted unless he/she attends summer school and scores at Below the Standard or above on the state math assessment before the start of the new school year and, if the student performs at Below the Standard, the student's parents/guardian and the district agree on an individual improvement plan. http://www.legis.state.de.us/LIS/LIS141.NSF/vwLegislation/
Title: S.B. 322
Source: www.legis.state.de.us
| |
| OK | Signed into law 05/2002 | P-12 | Narrows the requirements for remediation in grades three through eight to the subject areas of reading and mathematics.
Title: S.B. 1631
Source: 2002 Session Highlights
| |
| MD | Signed into law 05/2002 | P-12 | Establishes sales and use tax on telecommunications service in Prince George's County. Net proceeds from the revenue must be used only as supplemental funds for the operation of the Prince George's County School System. The board must consider using such funds for the provision of a program for at-risk or low-performing students in grades 6-12 that meets specified criteria; and a Spanish language immersion program for at least 450 pupils in grades K-5. http://mlis.state.md.us/2002rs/bills/hb/hb0949e.rtf
Title: H.B. 949
Source: mlis.state.md.us
| |
| SC | Signed into law 05/2002 | P-12 | Requires the State Department of Education to assist interested schools in implementing Structured Academic Mentoring Programs, designed to improve student performance and to assist these schools in developing Structured Academic Mentoring Programs that meet criteria necessary to qualiify for reading first funds established under the no Child Left Behind Act or any other available source.
Title: S.B. 834
Source: http://www.scstatehouse.net/wdprever/currsess/834_20020418.doc
| |
| AL | Signed into law 04/2002 | P-12 | Appropriates specified funds from the Education Trust Fund to the State Department of Education for the support and maintenance for a tutorial program for the fiscal year; provides that the appropriation is subject to certain provisions of the Code of Alabama 1975; requires an operations plan and an audited financial statement prior to the release of funds. http://alisdb.legislature.state.al.us/acas/searchableinstruments/2002rs/bills/hb143.htm
Title: H.B. 143
Source: alisdb.legislature.state.al.us
| |
| KY | Signed into law 04/2002 | P-12 | Authorizes the commissioner of education to approve district requests for grant waivers that would allow the district to use grants for extended day/week/year through an "alternative service delivery option," including offering programs during the school day.
Title: H.B. 626
Source: Lexis-Nexis/StateNet
| |
| MS | Signed into law 04/2002 | P-12 | Allows any local school district to fund extended day and -year programs for kindergarten or compulsory age students through sources other than the adequate education program. Permits local boards to expend funds from any available sources to help defray costs of student field trips to public or private nonprofit museums. Allows local boards to enter into contracts or agreements with public or private individuals or entities to provide staff training or development. Requires School Executive Management Institute to issue certificates of completion to those school board members who complete the basic education course within the institute. Deletes language relating to required content and location of local board member basic training courses. Transfers responsibility for issuance of school board member continuing education courses from institute to state school boards association. Requires state school boards association to report annually to state board and assembly education committee chairs on activites and provide evaluation of continuing education programs offered by the association each year. Eliminates language mandating content of continuing education courses conducted by School Executive Management Institute for elementary and secondary school principals. Eliminates language requiring board members to file annually a certificate of completion of continuing education course conducted by postsecondary institutions but maintains same requirement for courses conducted by Mississippi School Boards Association. http://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2002/html/HB/0400-0499/HB0494SG.htm
Title: H.B. 494
Source: billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
| |
| WV | Signed into law 03/2002 | P-12 | The legislature finds that schools that have implemented programs to strengthen student learning ability are reporting statistically significant improvement in the statewide test scores in reading, language and math of students referred to the programs. Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature through this section to establish a more formal method to fund programs that strengthen student learning ability. The state board is required to establish a program for strengthening student learning ability that includes the following: (1) A procedure for schools to apply for funds to implement programs to strengthen student learning ability in accordance with the provisions of this section; (2) Specific factors for determining the need for each school applying for funds in accordance with subsection (e) of this section; (3) A method for judging applications for funds on a competitive basis; and (4) A determination of the maximum percentage of total funds appropriated for the purposes of this section which may be distributed for use in grades six through twelve so that the priority for program implementation is at the prekindergarten and elementary levels. Proposed programs must include the following:
(1) Assessment of the cognitive abilities of students; (2) Physical screening that identifies barriers to a student's ability to learn; (3) Development of a student-specific program to improve student learning ability based on the results of the assessment and physical screening; (4) Administration of learning development exercises that strengthen the ability of students to learn; and (5) An evaluation of the program's impact, including factors such as student test scores and other measures of student performance, the program's impact on special education referrals, program cost and other information considered important for judging the value of the program.
Also includes an early childhood component. ftp://129.71.164.29/ftp-house02/HB4001-4100/
Title: H.B. 4022
Source: West Virginia state web site
| |
| CA | Signed into law 01/2002 | P-12 | Intensive reading instruction is to be offered four hours per day for six continuous weeks during the summer or when school is not regularly in session. Due to facilities constraints or for other educational reasons, a school district may offer intensive reading instruction before school, after school, on Saturdays, or during intersession, or in a combination of summer school, before school, after school, Saturday, or intersession instruction. Services may be provided to pupils during the regular instructional day if the instruction is delivered by a certificated employee, provided that the employee is not the pupil's regular classroom teacher, and does not result in the pupil being removed from regular classroom instruction. Other service providers should have appropriate training in the teaching of reading. A school district that operates a program pursuant to this article is not required to provide a meal or snack to pupils participating in the
program.
Title: A.B. 804
Source: California Legislative Web Site
| |
| OH | Signed into law 11/2001 | P-12 | Requires districts and community schools (charters) to provide intervention services to students who fail to attain a proficient score on any fourth grade proficiency test, and creates an intervention requirement for students who score below the proficient level on any 9th grade proficiency test or below the "basic" level on the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th or 8th grade achievement tests. Permits schools and districts to use a below basic score on 4th, 5th. 7th or 8th grade achievement tests "as a factor in any decision to deny promotion" to the next grade level.
Title: S.B. 1
Source: 2001 Digest of Enactments
| |