How States Allocate Funding for Rural Schools

This is the last of a three-part series that explores ways that states fund education for special student populations and school characteristics. More information on the state policies referenced in this series can be found in our 50-State Comparison on K-12 Funding.

All states have rural districts and schools and must contend with barriers that prevent equitable and adequate education for all. In fact, in 23 states, more than 20% of students attend a rural school. Research shows that rural schools face many of the same challenges as urban schools, albeit in a different context: High levels of poverty negatively affect property tax revenue, an educational achievement gap between racial and ethnic groups remains, and it’s difficult for schools to recruit and retain good teachers. Indeed, teachers are expected to do more with fewer resources in rural schools.

One way states attempt to address these challenges is by increasing the amount of money rural schools receive through funding formulas, specifically with small school size and isolated school funding adjustment policies. According to our recent 50-State Comparison on K-12 Funding, 29 states have a small size or isolated adjustment policy in statute.

Small and isolated schools

Statutory definitions for each policy vary state by state. Generally, small schools and districts refer to those with low enrollment numbers within a set range (under 100 students is a common threshold). While in many instances small schools are also isolated schools, not all isolated schools are necessarily small schools.

Isolated schools and districts indicate geographic isolation or a need for increased resources to provide an adequate and equitable education, compared with non-isolated schools and districts. States identify isolated schools and districts based on whether they meet one or more of the following factors:

  • The distance between schools.
  • The distance or time required for students to travel to their school.
  • The population density of the area surrounding the school.
  • The total geographic area of the school district.
  • Whether geographic barriers are present.

Small school and district funding

Funding for small schools and districts depends on a state’s funding formula. Some states provide extra funds to schools below enrollment, while others use teacher-to-student ratios.  For example, Alaska provides additional funding by allowing districts to increase their enrollment count. The amount of the adjustment to the enrollment count decreases as the school size increases, providing more funding for smaller schools. In South Dakota, additional funding for small schools is calculated by adjusting the target teacher ratio based on enrollment.

Isolated school funding

After states identify a school or district as isolated, they adjust the funding formula to allocate additional funds accordingly. They provide funding either on a sliding scale, based on the size of the school or district, or based on the budgetary discretion of the legislature. However, some state isolation funding adjustment policies cap additional funds for schools based on how large a school or district is. Arkansas, for instance, provides additional funding for isolated school districts that meet certain geographic and sparsity criteria but limit a district’s eligibility based on an enrollment threshold.

Click here if you missed the other blog posts in this series. If our team at Education Commission of the States can help as you work on your state’s K-12 education funding system, feel free to contact us.

Author profile

Alyssa Evans

Alyssa Evans

Policy Researcher at Education Commission of the States | aevans@ecs.org

As a policy researcher, Alyssa contributes to the policy team's work in various areas of state education policy. Prior to joining Education Commission of the States, she worked as a legislative aide in the Colorado General Assembly. Alyssa earned a bachelor's degree in economics from the University of Denver and a master's degree in public policy and international law from the American University of Paris.

Author profile

Lauren Freemire

Lauren Freemire

State Relations Strategist at Education Commission of the States | lfreemire@ecs.org

Lauren supports the state relations team in cultivating relationships and building partnerships with all Education Commission of the States Commissioners. She is the liaison for Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Tennessee. Prior to joining Education Commission of the States, Lauren worked on public policy and government relations with Save the Children Action Network in Colorado, Clayton Early Learning, National Conference of State Legislatures and with several members of the legislative and executive branches in Colorado. Lauren is dedicated to helping policymakers across the states connect and collaborate to improve education systems for all students.

About Us

At Education Commission of the States, we believe in the power of learning from experience. Every day, we provide education leaders with unbiased information and opportunities for collaboration. We do this because we know that informed policymakers create better education policy.

Copyright 2024 / Education Commission of the States. All rights reserved.

chevron-downarrow-rightmenu-circlecross-circle